H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Mona Barthel vs Su Jeong Jang H2H: 1-0
Mona Barthel holds a 1–0 lead over Su Jeong Jang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mona Barthel won the 2015 Seoul third round 6-0 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2015* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mona Barthel | 6-0 7-6(2) | Su Jeong Jang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Su Jeong Jang | #476 | #114 | 591 | 1,599 | 7 | 21 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mona Barthel | Su Jeong Jang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #331 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #143 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #162 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |