H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mona Guerrant vs Janet Newberry H2H: 0-5
Janet Newberry holds a 5–0 lead over Mona Guerrant in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Janet Newberry leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1978 Hilton Head third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
5
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1978* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-2 6-4 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1976* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Janet Newberry | 7-6(1) 6-3 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1972* | Moscow | WTA 500 | QF | — | Janet Newberry | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1972* | Hilversum | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-4 7-5 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
| Mar 25, 1972* | Richmond | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-4 7-5 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Guerrant | — | — | — | 1,939 | 123 | 117 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mona Guerrant | Janet Newberry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1972 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1973 | 17–19 | 47.2% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1975 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1976 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1977 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1978 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1980 | 14–4 | 77.8% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |