H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Monica Niculescu vs Anne Keothavong H2H: 1-0

Monica Niculescu holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Keothavong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Niculescu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Niculescu won the 2011 Luxembourg semifinal 7-5 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Niculescu
Romania Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Anne Keothavong
GBR Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Niculescu #34 7-5 4-6 6-3 Anne Keothavong #93 Match data Oct 22, 2011* SF Luxembourg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monica Niculescu #958 #28 1,960 1,779 179 214 45.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Anne Keothavong #287 #48 1,315 1,633 48 90 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Niculescu Anne Keothavong
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #271 1,486 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #236 1,475 0 0
19 2007 0–1 0.0% #152 1,490 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #177 1,464 0 0
20 2008 8–15 34.8% #48 1,543 0 0 2004 2–4 33.3% #180 1,485 0 0
21 2009 10–22 31.2% #103 1,522 0 0 2005 1–3 25.0% #236 1,466 0 0
22 2010 6–9 40.0% #82 1,574 0 0 2006 0–7 0.0% #144 1,400 0 0
23 2011 21–15 58.3% #30 1,757 0 0 2007 3–5 37.5% #132 1,425 0 0
24 2012 15–23 39.5% #58 1,639 0 0 2008 4–8 33.3% #60 1,464 0 0
25 2013 22–21 51.2% #59 1,635 0 1 2009 13–15 46.4% #100 1,540 0 0
26 2014 22–19 53.7% #46 1,688 0 2 2010 11–13 45.8% #121 1,613 0 0
27 2015 20–21 48.8% #39 1,676 0 2 2011 8–9 47.1% #72 1,617 0 0
28 2016 26–19 57.8% #38 1,758 0 3 2012 6–18 25.0% #143 1,526 0 0
29 2017 12–19 38.7% #77 1,622 0 3 2013 0–4 0.0% #287 1,481 0 0
30 2018 9–15 37.5% #99 1,591 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2019 8–10 44.4% #118 1,638 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2020 0–2 0.0% #144 1,586 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2021 0–3 0.0% #274 1,519 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Monica Niculescu Anne Keothavong
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 2008 6 10 16 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
21 2009 6 13 19 31.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2010 4 7 11 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
23 2011 17 9 26 65.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
24 2012 12 15 27 44.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2013 20 14 34 58.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 7 7 14 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2014 18 14 32 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2015 10 14 24 41.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 2011 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2016 23 13 36 63.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 4 11 15 26.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
29 2017 11 13 24 45.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2018 9 14 23 39.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143 148 291 49.1% 20 40 60 33.3% 14 23 37 37.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — 33 47 80 41.2% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 31 39 20.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 341/394 of Monica Niculescu's and 111/136 of Anne Keothavong's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Monica Niculescu Anne Keothavong
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2007 1/1 0.0 4.0 57.4% 45.2% 34.8% 25.0% 100.0% 40.7% 30.8% 2003 1/2 1.0 5.0 55.0% 54.5% 27.8% 50.0% 0.0% 42.5% 32.6%
20 2008 19/23 1.3 1.9 72.5% 54.5% 38.0% 41.9% 45.0% 49.9% 43.0% 2004 1/6 1.0 3.0 57.1% 50.0% 38.1% 44.4% 25.0% 44.9% 34.0%
21 2009 30/32 1.0 1.4 71.6% 55.9% 46.3% 44.0% 48.4% 52.8% 43.8% 2005 1/4 0.0 2.0 59.1% 46.2% 22.2% 14.3% 100.0% 36.4% 31.6%
22 2010 12/15 0.3 1.0 73.4% 53.0% 39.4% 47.7% 45.0% 49.3% 43.9% 2006 3/7 1.3 2.0 56.9% 47.1% 38.4% 35.5% 54.5% 43.8% 31.0%
23 2011 29/36 0.7 1.5 74.9% 55.3% 46.1% 44.2% 60.9% 52.3% 48.8% 2007 8/8 1.9 4.0 52.9% 60.9% 38.8% 41.8% 52.7% 51.0% 45.5%
24 2012 33/38 1.3 1.1 67.1% 58.0% 47.7% 51.8% 46.0% 54.3% 43.3% 2008 12/12 2.4 3.5 57.9% 61.2% 40.5% 43.7% 40.4% 52.6% 45.2%
25 2013 37/43 0.8 1.5 74.6% 59.2% 45.9% 47.0% 52.2% 55.3% 49.4% 2009 24/28 2.6 3.0 58.7% 62.7% 45.1% 56.9% 43.0% 55.3% 44.6%
26 2014 34/41 1.2 3.1 70.2% 60.8% 41.3% 50.8% 59.1% 55.0% 51.0% 2010 21/24 1.7 3.1 57.4% 58.4% 44.8% 44.3% 48.3% 52.3% 44.6%
27 2015 32/41 1.1 2.8 70.4% 60.4% 46.2% 47.8% 43.9% 55.9% 43.1% 2011 15/17 1.4 3.7 58.8% 61.8% 48.1% 55.3% 52.1% 56.4% 44.6%
28 2016 41/46 1.3 1.9 71.6% 57.0% 43.8% 43.2% 51.4% 53.4% 50.0% 2012 21/24 2.6 4.3 53.8% 57.4% 40.5% 43.9% 41.0% 49.7% 39.4%
29 2017 27/31 0.4 1.2 82.8% 52.1% 47.0% 51.7% 49.9% 51.2% 44.9% 2013 4/4 2.0 3.8 56.5% 47.2% 45.0% 45.8% 35.8% 46.4% 37.4%
30 2018 23/24 0.3 1.5 77.6% 55.6% 46.3% 46.4% 51.8% 53.0% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 18/18 0.4 1.5 79.1% 56.5% 45.6% 37.0% 46.4% 54.6% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 2/2 1.0 1.5 79.6% 49.7% 35.3% 49.4% 42.2% 46.7% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 3/3 0.3 1.3 74.9% 47.5% 49.1% 46.0% 50.0% 46.5% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Monica Niculescu Anne Keothavong
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.13
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1476 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.04
19 2007 1491 98.2 -0.35 +1.13 0.519 36.6% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05 2003 1465 96.7 -0.21 -0.44 0.567 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14
20 2008 1543 120.1 -2.90 -0.19 0.859 46.3% +10 -13 +47 34.6% -1.12 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 +0.05 2004 1486 100.8 -1.08 -0.67 0.618 39.6% — — -13 43.8% -0.81 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30
21 2009 1523 112.7 -2.66 -0.26 0.928 48.0% +26 -22 — 34.7% -1.10 3–7 (30%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.79 2005 1467 93.4 -2.33 -1.56 0.496 34.1% — — — 25.0% -1.88 — — — +0.24
22 2010 1574 117.8 -2.83 +0.34 0.866 46.8% -1 — — 41.7% -0.81 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 101.0 -0.32 2006 1401 89.0 -3.21 -4.76 0.551 37.7% +51 — -4 6.7% -3.53 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
23 2011 1758 133.3 -2.06 +3.84 1.021 50.5% -10 -238 -215 53.8% +0.41 7–3 (70%) 3–5 (38%) 103.5 +0.37 2007 1425 100.9 -2.40 +0.38 0.930 48.4% +60 — -67 44.4% -0.44 0–2 0–2 — +0.41
24 2012 1640 125.0 -1.30 -0.32 0.949 48.8% +48 -164 -85 42.4% -0.47 3–8 (27%) 6–1 (86%) 96.9 +0.44 2008 1465 118.5 -1.50 +0.68 0.954 48.9% +49 — -108 35.7% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 101.0 +0.21
25 2013 1635 132.6 -0.55 +4.14 1.104 52.3% +66 -181 — 52.1% +0.24 6–8 (43%) 4–2 (67%) 97.6 -0.53 2009 1540 114.7 -0.29 -0.29 0.999 50.0% +25 +44 -156 46.8% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 6–2 (75%) 101.8 +1.51
26 2014 1688 140.2 -1.17 +5.03 1.133 53.0% +7 -148 — 57.1% +1.03 8–12 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 93.9 -0.85 2010 1613 116.3 -2.69 +0.49 0.935 48.4% +3 -16 -248 44.6% -0.57 5–5 (50%) 1–1 — -0.61
27 2015 1677 131.5 -1.57 +1.81 0.978 49.6% -20 -106 -62 50.0% +0.03 10–10 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 105.1 -0.95 2011 1618 117.6 +0.58 +1.18 1.022 50.6% +10 — — 51.2% +0.15 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +0.35
28 2016 1759 135.4 -1.87 +5.53 1.073 51.7% +23 -229 — 56.0% +0.42 8–6 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 100.6 +0.22 2012 1527 113.8 -3.60 -2.34 0.783 44.5% +33 -4 -99 35.2% -1.00 1–7 (13%) 2–2 (50%) 94.2 -0.95
29 2017 1622 118.4 -3.66 +1.26 0.920 48.1% +24 -137 -27 40.9% -0.64 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +0.21 2013 1481 97.1 -3.69 -0.76 0.696 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.38 — — — -0.11
30 2018 1591 133.1 -2.27 +2.61 1.010 50.2% +6 — — 39.6% -0.48 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1638 129.0 -1.03 +1.89 1.019 50.3% +11 — -43 46.2% -0.05 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 98.8 -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1587 99.7 -1.05 +1.06 0.754 43.7% — — — 33.3% -2.34 0–2 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1519 98.6 -2.42 -0.40 0.685 41.9% — — — 0.0% -3.17 — — — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1531 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1780 134.0 -1.87 +2.44 0.996 49.9% +19 -140 -64 46.8% -0.13 63–79 (44%) 30–32 (48%) 97.9 -0.41 — 1633 113.5 -1.76 -0.33 0.896 47.5% +25 +21 -101 39.3% -0.82 14–31 (31%) 13–12 (52%) 92.4 +0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.