H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Monica Niculescu vs Ekaterina Ivanova H2H: 1-0
Monica Niculescu holds a 1–0 lead over Ekaterina Ivanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Niculescu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Niculescu won the 2010 Tashkent fourth round 0-6 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2010* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Monica Niculescu | 0-6 6-0 6-1 | Ekaterina Ivanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Niculescu | #958 | #28 | 1,960 | 1,807 | 176 | 213 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ekaterina Ivanova | #1,270 | #136 | 464 | 1,514 | 10 | 16 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Monica Niculescu | Ekaterina Ivanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #48 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #103 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #58 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #77 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #118 | 1,627 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |