H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Monica Niculescu vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-1

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Monica Niculescu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2012 Luxembourg final 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Niculescu
ROU Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 21, 2012* Luxembourg WTA 250 F Hard Venus Williams #41 6-2 6-3 Monica Niculescu #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Niculescu #958 #28 1,960 1,807 176 213 45.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Niculescu Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2007 0–1 0.0% #152 1,490 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2008 8–15 34.8% #48 1,542 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2009 10–22 31.2% #103 1,522 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2010 6–9 40.0% #82 1,573 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2011 21–15 58.3% #30 1,755 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2012 15–23 39.5% #58 1,639 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2013 22–21 51.2% #59 1,637 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2014 22–19 53.7% #46 1,687 0 2 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2015 20–21 48.8% #39 1,677 0 2 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2016 25–17 59.5% #38 1,782 0 3 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2017 10–19 34.5% #77 1,618 0 3 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2018 9–15 37.5% #99 1,588 0 3 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2019 8–11 42.1% #118 1,627 0 3 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2020 0–2 0.0% #144 1,579 0 3 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2021 0–3 0.0% #274 1,514 0 3 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47