H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Monica Niculescu vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 2-2
Monica Niculescu and Yanina Wickmayer are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Monica Niculescu leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Yanina Wickmayer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yanina Wickmayer won the 2015 Guangzhou quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2015* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-2 6-2 | Monica Niculescu | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2013* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Monica Niculescu | 6-1 6-2 | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
| Apr 5, 2013* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Monica Niculescu | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
| May 24, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-0 6-3 | Monica Niculescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Niculescu | #958 | #28 | 1,960 | 1,807 | 176 | 213 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Monica Niculescu | Yanina Wickmayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2008 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #48 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2009 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #103 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2011 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #58 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2013 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2014 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2016 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #77 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2018 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2019 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #118 | 1,627 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 |