H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Monica Puig vs Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic H2H: 0-1
Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic holds a 1–0 lead over Monica Puig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic won the 2014 Oeiras third round 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2014* | Oeiras | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Monica Puig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,838 | 128 | 136 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | #546 | #32 | 1,485 | 1,737 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Monica Puig | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #73 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #725 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,518 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |