H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Monica Puig vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 2-1

Monica Puig holds a 2–1 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Monica Puig leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2017 Acapulco second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Puig
PUR Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Puig #42 6-4 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #244 Match data Mar 2, 2017* R16 Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #46 7-6(1) 3-6 7-5 Monica Puig #48 Match data Mar 5, 2015* R32 Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Monica Puig #60 6-0 4-6 6-0 Daniela Hantuchova #31 Match data May 14, 2014* R64 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monica Puig #1,073 #27 1,570 1,843 139 140 49.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 461 365 55.8% 0 0 2 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Puig Daniela Hantuchova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 2011 0–1 0.0% #211 1,492 0 0 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,550 0 0
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0
19 2013 13–15 46.4% #56 1,570 0 0 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1
20 2014 16–18 47.1% #59 1,614 0 1 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,751 0 1
21 2015 15–23 39.5% #92 1,578 0 1 2004 25–25 50.0% #31 1,710 0 1
22 2016 41–24 63.1% #32 1,770 0 2 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,863 0 1
23 2017 20–21 48.8% #58 1,724 0 2 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 1
24 2018 18–14 56.2% #53 1,780 0 2 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,932 0 3
25 2019 16–19 45.7% #79 1,686 0 2 2008 22–20 52.4% #21 1,757 0 3
26 2020 0–2 0.0% #105 1,623 0 2 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,809 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,781 0 3
28 2022 0–1 0.0% #1073 1,619 0 2 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,791 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2012 24–23 51.1% #32 1,692 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,571 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,572 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2016 1–9 10.0% #228 1,514 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,526 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Monica Puig Daniela Hantuchova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
18 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 8 12 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4%
19 2013 5 11 16 31.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2002 28 13 41 68.3% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 2014 9 12 21 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2004 13 14 27 48.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2016 25 14 39 64.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2005 31 17 48 64.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2017 17 15 32 53.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 26 18 44 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2018 17 12 29 58.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 36 18 54 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 7 13 20 35.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 23 15 38 60.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 24 18 42 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 20 16 36 55.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 21 19 40 52.5% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 15 17 32 46.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 5 15 20 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 11 12 23 47.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 91 94 185 49.2% 34 30 64 53.1% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — — 290 239 529 54.8% 79 67 146 54.1% 66 39 105 62.9% 26 20 46 56.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 252/279 of Monica Puig's and 512/705 of Daniela Hantuchova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Monica Puig Daniela Hantuchova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 1/1 2.0 7.0 59.8% 64.5% 41.2% 53.8% 50.0% 55.1% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1/2 4.0 3.0 50.0% 62.5% 53.1% 75.0% 0.0% 57.8% 30.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 27/28 2.7 2.7 62.4% 62.4% 51.4% 41.8% 51.2% 58.1% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 33/34 3.1 4.4 59.8% 66.4% 46.7% 51.1% 46.9% 58.4% 42.7% 2003 7/49 2.1 2.6 61.5% 62.8% 53.0% 46.0% 45.9% 59.1% 46.5%
21 2015 32/38 4.4 4.0 60.7% 65.2% 51.0% 50.2% 49.1% 59.4% 38.4% 2004 8/50 2.6 3.0 59.5% 62.1% 44.2% 43.0% 64.2% 55.1% 40.9%
22 2016 52/65 3.1 3.6 62.0% 64.8% 49.8% 58.7% 46.5% 59.0% 44.7% 2005 15/63 4.0 3.2 58.2% 69.2% 46.3% 50.6% 45.0% 59.1% 47.9%
23 2017 39/41 3.3 3.4 60.1% 65.6% 47.8% 54.0% 45.1% 58.7% 42.8% 2006 42/60 3.4 2.7 63.8% 66.1% 44.7% 56.1% 46.8% 58.5% 42.5%
24 2018 31/32 3.0 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 45.7% 52.7% 48.6% 58.6% 42.1% 2007 74/78 3.5 2.6 65.4% 68.4% 47.9% 58.5% 49.2% 61.2% 45.2%
25 2019 33/35 3.3 3.6 62.5% 66.1% 48.0% 60.1% 51.9% 59.1% 44.1% 2008 36/42 2.1 2.2 64.4% 64.5% 45.8% 57.0% 50.2% 57.8% 43.5%
26 2020 2/2 1.5 6.0 64.6% 55.7% 28.2% 29.8% 28.6% 46.0% 34.8% 2009 57/61 2.4 2.4 63.3% 63.3% 46.3% 49.7% 49.1% 57.1% 43.5%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 49/56 2.7 2.6 64.9% 64.3% 46.9% 52.9% 49.4% 58.1% 43.8%
28 2022 1/1 0.0 5.0 60.3% 51.2% 33.3% 53.8% 33.3% 44.1% 32.7% 2011 64/66 3.2 2.6 62.8% 65.9% 49.7% 59.9% 47.6% 59.8% 45.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 38/47 2.4 3.7 62.2% 63.6% 45.7% 53.2% 51.4% 56.9% 41.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 42/47 2.6 3.4 60.9% 63.1% 43.8% 50.7% 46.6% 55.7% 41.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 37/40 2.3 3.8 62.5% 61.8% 44.7% 51.5% 43.1% 55.5% 41.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 32/34 2.1 3.9 66.6% 62.2% 47.7% 44.5% 46.3% 57.3% 39.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 9/10 2.4 3.4 60.6% 53.1% 39.7% 35.1% 52.9% 48.3% 38.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 2/2 3.0 5.5 65.7% 66.4% 37.9% 50.0% 39.2% 56.7% 41.9%
Career — 252/279 3.2 3.6 61.2% 65.2% 48.4% 53.3% 47.8% 58.6% 42.6% — 512/826 2.8 2.9 63.4% 64.6% 46.5% 53.3% 48.3% 58.0% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Monica Puig Daniela Hantuchova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1494 105.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.20
17 2011 1492 103.5 -1.04 -2.47 1.020 50.6% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.15 2000 1550 115.3 — — — — +15 -2 — 44.8% -0.73 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 +0.04
18 2012 1464 94.8 -3.46 -3.96 0.711 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17 2001 1710 143.1 — — — — -61 -102 +42 55.0% +0.45 4–8 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 98.9 -1.24
19 2013 1571 123.3 +1.46 -0.93 1.027 50.5% -93 +68 +69 50.0% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 101.7 +0.09 2002 1920 160.1 — — — — -36 -168 -31 63.3% +1.02 13–9 (59%) 10–4 (71%) 108.1 +1.09
20 2014 1615 129.5 +1.33 -0.33 1.027 50.6% -75 +119 0 48.7% +0.15 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.29 2003 1752 137.7 +1.71 +1.73 1.137 52.9% +26 +6 +110 50.9% -0.12 9–5 (64%) 12–5 (71%) 106.4 +2.36
21 2015 1579 121.9 +0.62 -2.26 0.948 49.1% +9 +55 -13 42.4% -0.19 3–8 (27%) 5–11 (31%) 91.9 -0.38 2004 1710 131.4 +0.32 -0.58 0.910 48.4% +1 -22 +176 46.7% -0.17 11–6 (65%) 9–8 (53%) 103.9 -0.74
22 2016 1771 137.9 +2.19 +1.46 1.092 52.0% -9 -57 -89 58.9% +0.70 12–5 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 108.8 -0.14 2005 1863 153.2 +2.43 +2.83 1.170 53.1% +26 -199 -56 56.1% +0.53 13–6 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 103.6 -0.05
23 2017 1724 133.3 +2.17 -0.36 1.036 50.7% +15 -63 — 47.4% -0.04 8–9 (47%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 -0.88 2006 1838 147.6 +2.67 -0.32 1.025 50.7% +7 -127 +7 54.0% +0.26 17–8 (68%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 +0.07
24 2018 1780 137.8 +0.96 +0.23 1.017 50.5% +6 — — 56.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.8 -0.76 2007 1932 154.4 +5.20 +1.87 1.165 53.3% -6 -130 +1 63.3% +0.90 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 108.1 +2.67
25 2019 1686 127.3 +1.69 +0.90 1.076 51.5% -34 +39 -64 50.0% +0.35 4–8 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 92.6 -0.89 2008 1757 140.8 +2.10 -0.03 1.032 50.5% +2 — — 53.2% +0.13 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 97.7 +0.80
26 2020 1624 94.4 -0.47 -3.91 0.644 40.5% — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 2009 1809 138.5 +1.75 -0.25 1.015 50.3% -33 -39 +107 55.7% +0.39 18–9 (67%) 11–5 (69%) 106.6 +1.00
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1782 145.6 +2.86 +0.69 1.046 51.1% -3 -1 +88 55.6% +0.57 10–10 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 95.2 -1.22
28 2022 1619 101.3 +0.44 +1.01 0.584 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14 2011 1791 150.0 +3.89 +1.34 1.119 52.5% -42 +70 +168 60.4% +0.95 11–10 (52%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -1.84
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1692 138.5 +1.52 -0.83 0.958 49.3% +8 — +159 46.3% -0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 98.0 -1.10
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1684 132.7 +0.51 -1.74 0.944 48.9% -14 +86 +204 48.1% +0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 100.2 +1.34
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1571 119.0 -0.43 -1.17 0.933 48.4% -17 +164 +244 39.5% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — +2.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1573 117.2 -0.30 -2.09 0.931 48.5% -5 +70 +227 43.0% -0.67 7–4 (64%) 8–4 (67%) 106.6 -0.22
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1514 111.4 -2.93 -2.64 0.748 43.7% -12 — +237 18.2% -2.18 0–2 1–1 — -0.58
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1527 110.5 -1.92 +0.79 0.967 49.2% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 — — -0.21
Career — 1843 134.9 +1.52 -0.09 1.029 50.7% -18 +21 -39 50.3% +0.16 40–50 (44%) 29–34 (46%) 100.5 -1.10 — 1968 147.9 +2.22 +0.08 1.029 50.6% -7 -28 +111 53.5% +0.29 166–112 (60%) 112–90 (55%) 107.0 +0.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.