H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Monica Puig vs Galina Voskoboeva H2H: 1-0

Monica Puig holds a 1–0 lead over Galina Voskoboeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Puig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2013 Guangzhou Open round of 16 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Puig
PUR Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Galina Voskoboeva
Kazakhstan Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Puig #48 6-3 6-2 Galina Voskoboeva #81 Match data Sep 20, 2013* R16 Guangzhou Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monica Puig #1,073 #27 1,570 1,843 139 140 49.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Galina Voskoboeva #1,417 #42 1,284 1,701 70 121 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Puig Galina Voskoboeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 0–1 0.0% #211 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 13–15 46.4% #56 1,570 0 0 2004 3–4 42.9% #140 1,503 0 0
20 2014 16–18 47.1% #59 1,614 0 1 2005 4–9 30.8% #113 1,465 0 0
21 2015 15–23 39.5% #92 1,578 0 1 2006 2–11 15.4% #114 1,417 0 0
22 2016 41–24 63.1% #32 1,770 0 2 2007 2–6 25.0% #133 1,406 0 0
23 2017 20–21 48.8% #58 1,724 0 2 2008 8–12 40.0% #94 1,483 0 0
24 2018 18–14 56.2% #53 1,780 0 2 2009 8–17 32.0% #106 1,483 0 0
25 2019 16–19 45.7% #79 1,686 0 2 2010 0–4 0.0% #532 1,445 0 0
26 2020 0–2 0.0% #105 1,623 0 2 2011 14–9 60.9% #58 1,663 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2012 13–20 39.4% #82 1,583 0 0
28 2022 0–1 0.0% #1073 1,619 0 2 2013 13–16 44.8% #67 1,609 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2014 2–6 25.0% #259 1,553 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 0–3 0.0% #312 1,520 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 1–4 20.0% #421 1,482 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Monica Puig Galina Voskoboeva
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 5 11 16 31.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2004 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 9 12 21 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 2 9 11 18.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2016 25 14 39 64.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2007 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2017 17 15 32 53.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2018 17 12 29 58.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 5 9 14 35.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2019 7 13 20 35.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 9 12 21 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 91 94 185 49.2% 34 30 64 53.1% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — — 52 87 139 37.4% 16 27 43 37.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 252/279 of Monica Puig's and 146/171 of Galina Voskoboeva's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Monica Puig Galina Voskoboeva
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 1/1 2.0 7.0 59.8% 64.5% 41.2% 53.8% 50.0% 55.1% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1/2 4.0 3.0 50.0% 62.5% 53.1% 75.0% 0.0% 57.8% 30.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 27/28 2.7 2.7 62.4% 62.4% 51.4% 41.8% 51.2% 58.1% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 33/34 3.1 4.4 59.8% 66.4% 46.7% 51.1% 46.9% 58.4% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 32/38 4.4 4.0 60.7% 65.2% 51.0% 50.2% 49.1% 59.4% 38.4% 2006 4/13 2.0 2.3 56.8% 63.1% 47.2% 52.5% 45.5% 56.1% 32.8%
22 2016 52/65 3.1 3.6 62.0% 64.8% 49.8% 58.7% 46.5% 59.0% 44.7% 2007 6/8 1.8 2.8 54.5% 66.0% 46.7% 48.4% 42.0% 56.7% 42.7%
23 2017 39/41 3.3 3.4 60.1% 65.6% 47.8% 54.0% 45.1% 58.7% 42.8% 2008 14/20 2.7 3.4 56.3% 63.7% 40.8% 50.2% 37.1% 53.7% 40.6%
24 2018 31/32 3.0 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 45.7% 52.7% 48.6% 58.6% 42.1% 2009 22/25 2.4 2.3 58.2% 58.0% 37.9% 46.1% 50.9% 49.4% 40.3%
25 2019 33/35 3.3 3.6 62.5% 66.1% 48.0% 60.1% 51.9% 59.1% 44.1% 2010 4/4 3.0 3.0 54.5% 60.6% 39.7% 45.9% 37.3% 50.8% 37.4%
26 2020 2/2 1.5 6.0 64.6% 55.7% 28.2% 29.8% 28.6% 46.0% 34.8% 2011 22/23 2.9 3.1 52.1% 68.3% 49.6% 46.5% 52.9% 59.0% 45.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 30/33 3.7 2.3 56.4% 66.8% 49.7% 50.6% 42.7% 59.3% 42.1%
28 2022 1/1 0.0 5.0 60.3% 51.2% 33.3% 53.8% 33.3% 44.1% 32.7% 2013 28/29 3.5 3.0 58.1% 64.1% 45.4% 54.7% 41.8% 56.3% 42.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 8/8 3.3 4.5 51.3% 58.8% 41.3% 40.0% 45.0% 50.1% 39.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 3/3 2.3 1.0 60.3% 57.4% 41.4% 48.8% 32.0% 50.9% 42.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 5/5 2.0 2.8 57.0% 59.2% 39.7% 52.7% 29.9% 50.9% 42.4%
Career — 252/279 3.2 3.6 61.2% 65.2% 48.4% 53.3% 47.8% 58.6% 42.6% — 146/191 3.0 2.8 56.0% 63.7% 44.8% 49.3% 44.1% 55.2% 41.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Monica Puig Galina Voskoboeva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1492 103.5 -1.04 -2.47 1.020 50.6% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1464 94.8 -3.46 -3.96 0.711 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1571 123.3 +1.46 -0.93 1.027 50.5% -93 +68 +69 50.0% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 101.7 +0.09 2004 1503 103.3 — — — — +25 — — 37.5% -0.56 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.30
20 2014 1615 129.5 +1.33 -0.33 1.027 50.6% -75 +119 0 48.7% +0.15 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.29 2005 1465 103.4 — — — — +26 — — 35.7% -0.93 0–2 0–2 — +0.62
21 2015 1579 121.9 +0.62 -2.26 0.948 49.1% +9 +55 -13 42.4% -0.19 3–8 (27%) 5–11 (31%) 91.9 -0.38 2006 1418 113.9 +0.30 -3.05 0.747 44.5% +30 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–5 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 91.0 +0.15
22 2016 1771 137.9 +2.19 +1.46 1.092 52.0% -9 -57 -89 58.9% +0.70 12–5 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 108.8 -0.14 2007 1406 101.7 -1.48 -1.41 0.986 49.1% +23 +60 — 36.8% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.53
23 2017 1724 133.3 +2.17 -0.36 1.036 50.7% +15 -63 — 47.4% -0.04 8–9 (47%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 -0.88 2008 1484 119.6 -1.24 -2.21 0.877 47.3% +31 -13 — 39.5% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 +0.25
24 2018 1780 137.8 +0.96 +0.23 1.017 50.5% +6 — — 56.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.8 -0.76 2009 1483 110.1 -3.61 -2.64 0.796 44.9% +33 -17 — 35.2% -1.20 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.8 -0.15
25 2019 1686 127.3 +1.69 +0.90 1.076 51.5% -34 +39 -64 50.0% +0.35 4–8 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 92.6 -0.89 2010 1446 102.1 -2.26 -2.45 0.760 44.1% +36 — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.05
26 2020 1624 94.4 -0.47 -3.91 0.644 40.5% — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 2011 1663 142.4 +3.10 +1.28 1.115 52.3% +1 — — 58.5% +0.66 4–5 (44%) 1–3 (25%) 100.0 -0.77
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1584 127.7 +2.08 -0.93 1.034 50.6% +16 -58 -40 45.9% +0.08 2–10 (17%) 1–4 (20%) 89.2 -0.14
28 2022 1619 101.3 +0.44 +1.01 0.584 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14 2013 1610 127.4 +0.38 -0.92 0.978 49.5% -11 -23 — 47.9% -0.11 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.9 -0.59
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1554 103.3 -2.15 -2.13 0.789 44.9% -17 — — 33.3% -1.22 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.50
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1521 99.3 -0.14 -0.92 0.857 46.4% — — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.16
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1482 104.1 -0.51 -0.05 0.862 46.4% -4 — — 33.3% -1.58 0–2 — — -0.53
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1450 92.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1843 134.9 +1.52 -0.09 1.029 50.7% -18 +21 -39 50.3% +0.16 40–50 (44%) 29–34 (46%) 100.5 -1.10 — 1702 124.2 +0.05 -1.13 0.935 48.5% +13 -21 -40 40.8% -0.54 21–45 (32%) 13–28 (32%) 86.5 -0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.