H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Monica Puig vs Naomi Broady H2H: 2-1
Monica Puig holds a 2–1 lead over Naomi Broady in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Monica Puig leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2017 Luxembourg quarterfinal 6-0 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 36
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Monica Puig | 6-0 5-7 6-1 | Naomi Broady | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2016* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Naomi Broady | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Monica Puig | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2016* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Monica Puig | 6-1 6-1 | Naomi Broady | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2016 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Monica Puig | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Naomi Broady | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,838 | 128 | 136 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Naomi Broady | #1,209 | #76 | 875 | 1,604 | 24 | 41 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Monica Puig | Naomi Broady | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #117 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #250 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |