H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Monica Seles vs Anke Huber H2H: 9-0

Monica Seles holds a 9–0 lead over Anke Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 7–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1998 Canadian Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
9 – 0
9 main-draw meetings
Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Seles #6 6-3 6-4 Anke Huber #21 Match data Aug 22, 1998* QF Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Monica Seles #3 6-2 6-4 Anke Huber #8 Match data Aug 17, 1997* F Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Monica Seles #5 6-3 6-0 Anke Huber #7 Match data Apr 5, 1997* QF Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Monica Seles #1 6-4 6-1 Anke Huber #5 Match data Jan 29, 1996* F Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Monica Seles #1 6-1 6-4 Anke Huber #10 Match data Sep 5, 1995* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Monica Seles #1 6-3 6-2 Anke Huber #10 Match data Aug 19, 1995* QF Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Monica Seles #1 6-2 6-3 Anke Huber #11 Match data Nov 7, 1992* SF Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Monica Seles #1 7-5 6-3 Anke Huber #12 Match data Jan 24, 1992* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Monica Seles #2 6-3 6-1 Anke Huber #35 Match data Jan 25, 1991* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 586 123 82.7% 9 9 3 21 11 53
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,599 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,005 0 1 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,296 1 10 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,444 4 20 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,500 7 30 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,486 8 32 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6
20 — — — — — — — 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,488 8 33 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10
22 1996 46–9 83.6% #2 2,344 9 38 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,180 9 41 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,180 9 43 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,120 9 44 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12
26 2000 56–13 81.2% #4 2,153 9 47 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,132 9 51 — — — — — — —
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,091 9 53 — — — — — — —
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,994 9 53 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Monica Seles Anke Huber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 6 2 8 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
16 1990 18 2 20 90.0% 22 0 22 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
17 1991 40 3 43 93.0% 19 2 21 90.5% — — — — 15 1 16 93.8% 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7%
18 1992 33 3 36 91.7% 19 1 20 95.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 12 0 12 100.0% 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
19 1993 11 1 12 91.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0%
21 1995 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6%
22 1996 29 2 31 93.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1997 27 5 32 84.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3%
24 1998 20 5 25 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0%
25 1999 21 7 28 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2000 28 9 37 75.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 2001 36 9 45 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 27 8 35 77.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 316 63 379 83.4% 142 25 167 85.0% 35 11 46 76.1% 93 24 117 79.5% — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Monica Seles Anke Huber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1600 134.7 — — — — +49 — — 58.8% +0.29 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.41 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14
15 1989 2005 170.5 — — — — -46 -209 -385 75.8% +2.03 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 107.2 -0.76 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06
16 1990 2297 179.4 — — — — -85 -99 -561 84.8% +2.78 7–3 (70%) 7–1 (88%) 110.0 -3.90 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97
17 1991 2445 183.7 — — — — 0 -66 — 86.9% +3.17 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 105.2 -3.24 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03
18 1992 2501 182.5 — — — — +9 -35 -586 88.2% +3.24 10–1 (91%) 2–2 (50%) 107.7 -2.26 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91
19 1993 2486 173.2 — — — — +21 -78 — 85.4% +3.27 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.84 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78
21 1995 2488 169.9 — — — — +5 — — 92.0% +3.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.63 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81
22 1996 2344 176.3 — — — — +27 +5 -308 83.5% +2.58 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 96.5 -0.42 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85
23 1997 2181 174.0 — — — — +75 +103 -181 72.3% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 6–9 (40%) 90.3 -0.17 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.86
24 1998 2180 173.5 — — — — +55 +77 -125 70.2% +1.77 10–5 (67%) 4–7 (36%) 95.0 -1.32 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51
25 1999 2120 173.1 — — — — +56 +123 -164 73.3% +2.05 3–2 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 97.5 -0.29 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44
26 2000 2153 175.3 — — — — +19 +110 -86 78.0% +2.03 9–5 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 106.4 -2.96 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22
27 2001 2132 162.9 — — — — +27 — — 73.5% +1.72 10–5 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 95.6 +1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 2091 167.1 — — — — +54 +166 +47 70.1% +1.67 14–4 (78%) 6–7 (46%) 102.1 -1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1995 139.5 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +112 +183 — 56.8% +0.57 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2541 181.1 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +21 +17 -276 78.2% +2.32 102–45 (69%) 69–52 (57%) 102.4 -2.62 — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.