H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Monica Seles vs Anke Huber H2H: 9-0

Monica Seles holds a 9–0 lead over Anke Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 7–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1998 Canadian Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
9 0
9 main draw meetings
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 22, 1998* Canadian Open WTA 1000 QF Hard Monica Seles #6 6-3 6-4 Anke Huber #21 Match data
Aug 17, 1997* Canadian Open WTA 1000 F Hard Monica Seles #3 6-2 6-4 Anke Huber #8 Match data
Apr 5, 1997* Hilton Head WTA 1000 QF Clay Monica Seles #5 6-3 6-0 Anke Huber #7 Match data
Jan 29, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam F Hard Monica Seles #1 6-4 6-1 Anke Huber #5 Match data
Sep 5, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Monica Seles #1 6-1 6-4 Anke Huber #10 Match data
Aug 19, 1995* Canadian Open WTA 1000 QF Hard Monica Seles #1 6-3 6-2 Anke Huber #10 Match data
Nov 7, 1992* Oakland WTA 250 SF Carpet Monica Seles #1 6-2 6-3 Anke Huber #11 Match data
Jan 24, 1992* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Monica Seles #1 7-5 6-3 Anke Huber #12 Match data
Jan 25, 1991* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Monica Seles #2 6-3 6-1 Anke Huber #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10
22 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12
26 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53