H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Monica Seles vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 2-0

Monica Seles holds a 2–0 lead over Hana Mandlikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 1990 San Antonio quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Hana Mandlikova
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Seles #4 6-4 6-4 Hana Mandlikova #25 Match data Apr 2, 1990* QF San Antonio Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Monica Seles #7 6-0 6-1 Hana Mandlikova #16 Match data Oct 28, 1989* QF Brighton WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 586 123 82.7% 9 9 3 21 11 53
Hana Mandlikova #31 #3 157 2,315 518 191 73.1% 4 0 0 4 19 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Hana Mandlikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,005 0 1 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,296 1 10 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,758 0 2
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,444 4 20 1979 37–14 72.5% — 1,990 0 7
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,500 7 30 1980 76–17 81.7% #4 2,235 1 13
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,486 8 32 1981 56–24 70.0% #5 2,127 2 16
20 — — — — — — — 1982 35–19 64.8% #7 2,025 2 16
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,488 8 33 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,982 2 16
22 1996 46–9 83.6% #2 2,344 9 38 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,084 2 21
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,180 9 41 1985 53–13 80.3% #3 2,213 3 24
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,180 9 43 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,242 3 24
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,120 9 44 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,156 4 27
26 2000 56–13 81.2% #4 2,153 9 47 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,045 4 27
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,132 9 51 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,945 4 27
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,091 9 53 1990 8–9 47.1% #31 1,810 4 27
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,994 9 53 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Monica Seles Hana Mandlikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 6 2 8 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1990 18 2 20 90.0% 22 0 22 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
17 1991 40 3 43 93.0% 19 2 21 90.5% — — — — 15 1 16 93.8% 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 23 4 27 85.2% 2 4 6 33.3%
18 1992 33 3 36 91.7% 19 1 20 95.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 12 0 12 100.0% 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 19 5 24 79.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 20 5 25 80.0%
19 1993 11 1 12 91.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 1981 11 3 14 78.6% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 11 5 16 68.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0%
21 1995 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 12 4 16 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8%
22 1996 29 2 31 93.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 27 2 29 93.1%
23 1997 27 5 32 84.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 22 5 27 81.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 14 2 16 87.5%
24 1998 20 5 25 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 18 8 26 69.2%
25 1999 21 7 28 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 13 4 17 76.5%
26 2000 28 9 37 75.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 1988 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2001 36 9 45 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 1989 19 9 28 67.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
28 2002 27 8 35 77.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2003 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 316 63 379 83.4% 142 25 167 85.0% 35 11 46 76.1% 93 24 117 79.5% — 143 54 197 72.6% 119 46 165 72.1% 116 36 152 76.3% 133 52 185 71.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Monica Seles Hana Mandlikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1600 134.7 — — — — +49 — — 58.8% +0.29 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 2005 170.5 — — — — -46 -209 -385 75.8% +2.03 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 107.2 -0.76 1977 1492 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02
16 1990 2297 179.4 — — — — -85 -99 -561 84.8% +2.78 7–3 (70%) 7–1 (88%) 110.0 -3.90 1978 1759 142.2 — — — — — -128 -39 71.4% +1.84 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 104.0 +1.62
17 1991 2445 183.7 — — — — 0 -66 — 86.9% +3.17 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 105.2 -3.24 1979 1991 150.7 — — — — -306 -198 +6 67.9% +1.46 9–3 (75%) 5–6 (45%) 108.6 -0.72
18 1992 2501 182.5 — — — — +9 -35 -586 88.2% +3.24 10–1 (91%) 2–2 (50%) 107.7 -2.26 1980 2235 168.8 — — — — -89 -219 -70 77.5% +2.09 15–12 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 107.8 -9.15
19 1993 2486 173.2 — — — — +21 -78 — 85.4% +3.27 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.84 1981 2127 168.7 — — — — -45 -13 +80 70.8% +1.60 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -6.49
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2025 155.2 — — — — +44 +111 +37 60.3% +0.61 12–5 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -6.83
21 1995 2488 169.9 — — — — +5 — — 92.0% +3.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.63 1983 1983 163.6 — — — — +67 +169 +26 70.3% +1.45 3–9 (25%) 7–1 (88%) 95.7 -3.35
22 1996 2344 176.3 — — — — +27 +5 -308 83.5% +2.58 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 96.5 -0.42 1984 2084 165.9 — — — — +42 +34 -16 76.7% +2.05 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 103.0 -1.62
23 1997 2181 174.0 — — — — +75 +103 -181 72.3% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 6–9 (40%) 90.3 -0.17 1985 2213 169.9 — — — — +68 -92 -93 76.0% +1.84 9–5 (64%) 12–3 (80%) 109.1 -4.75
24 1998 2180 173.5 — — — — +55 +77 -125 70.2% +1.77 10–5 (67%) 4–7 (36%) 95.0 -1.32 1986 2242 174.9 — — — — +26 -48 -79 70.7% +1.50 10–5 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 98.7 -6.78
25 1999 2120 173.1 — — — — +56 +123 -164 73.3% +2.05 3–2 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 97.5 -0.29 1987 2156 168.9 — — — — +16 +20 +142 75.8% +1.97 9–3 (75%) 7–4 (64%) 102.5 -3.19
26 2000 2153 175.3 — — — — +19 +110 -86 78.0% +2.03 9–5 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 106.4 -2.96 1988 2045 145.0 — — — — +89 +61 +204 65.3% +1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 -0.30
27 2001 2132 162.9 — — — — +27 — — 73.5% +1.72 10–5 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 95.6 +1.21 1989 1946 155.1 — — — — +75 +103 +225 57.5% +0.38 15–3 (83%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 -3.52
28 2002 2091 167.1 — — — — +54 +166 +47 70.1% +1.67 14–4 (78%) 6–7 (46%) 102.1 -1.76 1990 1810 125.0 — — — — +120 +176 +361 51.4% +0.19 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.31
29 2003 1995 139.5 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +112 +183 — 56.8% +0.57 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2541 181.1 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +21 +17 -276 78.2% +2.32 102–45 (69%) 69–52 (57%) 102.4 -2.62 — 2316 169.2 — — — — +11 -14 +17 70.3% +1.52 108–63 (63%) 76–52 (59%) 107.2 -6.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.