H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Monica Seles vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 1-1
Monica Seles and Stephanie Foretz Gacon are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Foretz Gacon leads 1–0 on clay, while Monica Seles leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephanie Foretz Gacon won the 2002 Charleston fourth round 6-4 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 45
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2002* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | 6-4 7-6(6) | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2001* | Shanghai | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-1 5-7 6-2 | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 578 | 121 | 82.7% | 9 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 53 |
| Stephanie Foretz Gacon | — | — | — | 1,647 | 61 | 115 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Monica Seles | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,295 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,443 | 4 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,499 | 7 | 30 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,485 | 8 | 32 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,487 | 8 | 33 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 43–8 | 84.3% | #2 | 2,342 | 9 | 38 | 2003 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,159 | 9 | 41 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,174 | 9 | 43 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,116 | 9 | 44 | 2006 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 51–12 | 81.0% | #4 | 2,144 | 9 | 47 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,127 | 9 | 51 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,088 | 9 | 53 | 2009 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,993 | 9 | 53 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |