H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Monica Seles vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 1-1

Monica Seles and Stephanie Foretz Gacon are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Foretz Gacon leads 1–0 on clay, while Monica Seles leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephanie Foretz Gacon won the 2002 Charleston Open round of 16 6-4 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Stephanie Foretz Gacon
FRA Age 45 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stephanie Foretz Gacon 6-4 7-6(6) Monica Seles #6 Match data Apr 19, 2002* R16 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Monica Seles #8 6-1 5-7 6-2 Stephanie Foretz Gacon Match data Oct 13, 2001* QF Shanghai Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 586 123 82.7% 9 9 3 21 11 53
Stephanie Foretz Gacon — — — 1,647 61 115 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Seles Stephanie Foretz Gacon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,005 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,296 1 10 — — — — — — —
17 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,444 4 20 — — — — — — —
18 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,500 7 30 1999 1–2 33.3% — 1,511 0 0
19 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,486 8 32 2000 1–2 33.3% — 1,513 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2001 5–6 45.5% — 1,558 0 0
21 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,488 8 33 2002 11–12 47.8% — 1,604 0 0
22 1996 46–9 83.6% #2 2,344 9 38 2003 12–15 44.4% — 1,589 0 0
23 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,180 9 41 2004 3–10 23.1% — 1,532 0 0
24 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,180 9 43 2005 5–14 26.3% — 1,500 0 0
25 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,120 9 44 2006 5–14 26.3% — 1,443 0 0
26 2000 56–13 81.2% #4 2,153 9 47 2007 2–6 25.0% — 1,457 0 0
27 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,132 9 51 2008 0–2 0.0% — 1,455 0 0
28 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,091 9 53 2009 2–7 22.2% — 1,421 0 0
29 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,994 9 53 2010 0–3 0.0% — 1,401 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2011 2–6 25.0% — 1,406 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2012 10–10 50.0% — 1,513 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2013 2–5 28.6% — 1,501 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Monica Seles Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 6 2 8 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 18 2 20 90.0% 22 0 22 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 40 3 43 93.0% 19 2 21 90.5% — — — — 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 33 3 36 91.7% 19 1 20 95.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 12 0 12 100.0% 1999 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 1993 11 1 12 91.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 2000 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1995 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1996 29 2 31 93.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1997 27 5 32 84.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1998 20 5 25 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2005 2 9 11 18.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 1999 21 7 28 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 3 5 8 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2000 28 9 37 75.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2001 36 9 45 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2002 27 8 35 77.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2003 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 316 63 379 83.4% 142 25 167 85.0% 35 11 46 76.1% 93 24 117 79.5% — 31 59 90 34.4% 17 37 54 31.5% 11 17 28 39.3% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1/17 of Monica Seles's and 74/136 of Stephanie Foretz Gacon's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Monica Seles Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/27 1.5 6.8 53.2% 54.0% 39.1% 53.8% 40.0% 47.2% 46.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/13 1.2 5.2 56.7% 53.9% 47.6% 47.1% 38.1% 51.2% 42.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/19 2.5 7.0 59.4% 57.9% 44.5% 44.9% 46.2% 52.7% 44.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 12/19 1.8 4.7 61.9% 55.5% 38.3% 47.5% 40.8% 49.8% 41.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/8 1.8 6.8 57.8% 60.3% 32.5% 55.1% 54.2% 48.5% 36.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/2 1.0 1.0 70.7% 58.5% 23.5% 33.3% 100.0% 48.3% 34.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 8/9 1.8 4.8 62.8% 61.0% 46.9% 44.2% 42.6% 55.2% 41.2%
29 2003 1/17 1.0 12.0 54.2% 50.0% 25.9% 40.0% 28.6% 39.0% 42.9% 2010 2/3 1.5 3.5 59.5% 52.1% 24.3% 28.6% 7.1% 41.4% 30.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 7/8 3.0 4.0 58.8% 58.6% 43.5% 50.7% 57.5% 52.6% 39.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 18/20 2.6 3.6 55.5% 63.4% 44.5% 58.3% 46.7% 55.2% 44.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/7 1.3 3.7 55.2% 52.9% 37.3% 36.4% 53.7% 46.0% 46.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 13.0 7.0 64.1% 73.8% 36.2% 50.0% 42.9% 60.3% 41.5%
Career — 1/709 1.0 12.0 54.2% 50.0% 25.9% 40.0% 28.6% 39.0% 42.9% — 74/176 2.2 4.7 58.5% 58.6% 41.4% 49.0% 45.9% 51.6% 42.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Monica Seles Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1600 134.7 — — — — +49 — — 58.8% +0.29 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 2005 170.5 — — — — -46 -209 -385 75.8% +2.03 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 107.2 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 2297 179.4 — — — — -85 -99 -561 84.8% +2.78 7–3 (70%) 7–1 (88%) 110.0 -3.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 2445 183.7 — — — — 0 -66 — 86.9% +3.17 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 105.2 -3.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 2501 182.5 — — — — +9 -35 -586 88.2% +3.24 10–1 (91%) 2–2 (50%) 107.7 -2.26 1999 1511 107.7 — — — — — +38 — 37.5% -1.38 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.39
19 1993 2486 173.2 — — — — +21 -78 — 85.4% +3.27 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.84 2000 1513 105.7 — — — — — +27 — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1559 118.8 — — — — +31 -46 — 46.4% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -0.48
21 1995 2488 169.9 — — — — +5 — — 92.0% +3.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.63 2002 1605 127.2 — — — — -4 -29 -66 50.0% -0.10 1–3 (25%) 5–1 (83%) 101.5 +0.03
22 1996 2344 176.3 — — — — +27 +5 -308 83.5% +2.58 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 96.5 -0.42 2003 1589 115.5 -3.06 +0.16 0.879 47.0% 0 -51 +46 43.3% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 104.2 +0.97
23 1997 2181 174.0 — — — — +75 +103 -181 72.3% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 6–9 (40%) 90.3 -0.17 2004 1532 111.6 -1.58 -0.22 0.873 47.0% -19 +10 — 31.3% -1.19 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 100.0 -0.31
24 1998 2180 173.5 — — — — +55 +77 -125 70.2% +1.77 10–5 (67%) 4–7 (36%) 95.0 -1.32 2005 1501 103.6 -0.99 -0.13 0.938 48.6% -44 -15 +148 29.3% -1.44 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.82
25 1999 2120 173.1 — — — — +56 +123 -164 73.3% +2.05 3–2 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 97.5 -0.29 2006 1444 101.7 -4.22 -1.54 0.829 45.8% +32 -13 — 32.6% -1.22 3–5 (38%) 0–2 — +0.07
26 2000 2153 175.3 — — — — +19 +110 -86 78.0% +2.03 9–5 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 106.4 -2.96 2007 1457 115.6 -1.06 -2.17 0.702 42.7% +26 — — 27.8% -1.61 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.62
27 2001 2132 162.9 — — — — +27 — — 73.5% +1.72 10–5 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 95.6 +1.21 2008 1455 106.9 +3.39 +4.25 0.669 41.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.46
28 2002 2091 167.1 — — — — +54 +166 +47 70.1% +1.67 14–4 (78%) 6–7 (46%) 102.1 -1.76 2009 1421 97.6 -0.52 -1.66 0.920 47.9% +55 -3 +137 30.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.41
29 2003 1995 139.5 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +112 +183 — 56.8% +0.57 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -0.67 2010 1402 102.9 -1.39 -0.34 0.524 35.8% — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1407 106.9 -1.79 -0.90 0.842 46.7% +64 -4 — 31.6% -1.32 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1513 113.5 -0.88 +0.34 1.000 50.1% -12 -50 +63 52.3% -0.32 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.73
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1502 102.0 -3.63 +0.69 0.868 46.6% -19 -44 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 1–0 — -0.10
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1491 103.0 -2.87 -1.23 1.046 51.0% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.03
Career — 2541 181.1 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +21 +17 -276 78.2% +2.32 102–45 (69%) 69–52 (57%) 102.4 -2.62 — 1648 117.4 -1.86 -0.48 0.879 47.2% +3 -19 +71 38.2% -0.88 21–35 (38%) 21–15 (58%) 102.5 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.