H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Monique Van Haver vs Michelle Rodriguez H2H: 1-0

Monique Van Haver holds a 1–0 lead over Michelle Rodriguez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monique Van Haver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Monique Van Haver won the 1970 Knokke semifinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monique Van Haver
BEL Age 78
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Michelle Rodriguez
CHI

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monique Van Haver 6-2 6-3 Michelle Rodriguez Match data Aug 15, 1970* SF Knokke WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monique Van Haver — — — 1,581 30 38 44.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Michelle Rodriguez — — — 1,529 23 44 34.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Monique Van Haver Michelle Rodriguez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 2–3 40.0% — 1,492 0 0 1968 10–12 45.5% — 1,500 0 1
1969 0–3 0.0% — 1,446 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 1
1970 8–0 100.0% — 1,569 0 3 1970 2–10 16.7% — 1,429 0 1
1971 3–2 60.0% — 1,559 0 3 1971 2–8 20.0% — 1,409 0 1
1972 3–8 27.3% — 1,486 0 3 1972 1–5 16.7% — 1,387 0 1
1973 4–6 40.0% — 1,483 0 3 1973 4–3 57.1% — 1,443 0 1
1974 3–6 33.3% — 1,486 0 3 1974 2–2 50.0% — 1,470 0 1
1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 3 1975 2–2 50.0% — 1,492 0 1
1976 3–4 42.9% — 1,508 0 4 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 1
1977 1–1 50.0% — 1,507 0 4 — — — — — — —
1978 1–2 33.3% — 1,496 0 4 — — — — — — —
1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,487 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Monique Van Haver Michelle Rodriguez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1968 2 2 4 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — —
1969 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1970 — — — — 6 0 6 100.0% — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% 1970 — — — — 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1971 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
1972 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
1973 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1973 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
1974 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1975 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1976 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1977 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 0 1 1 0.0% 15 19 34 44.1% 8 13 21 38.1% 6 4 10 60.0% Career 2 2 4 50.0% 19 37 56 33.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Monique Van Haver Michelle Rodriguez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1493 102.5 — — — — — +2 — 41.7% -0.50 1–1 — — +0.29 1968 1501 95.2 — — — — +11 -5 — 36.4% -1.30 4–0 (100%) — — -0.21
1969 1447 87.3 — — — — — -11 — 14.3% -3.29 0–1 — — +0.40 1969 1484 99.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10
1970 1569 116.9 — — — — — +2 — 94.1% +3.35 1–0 — — +2.37 1970 1429 88.8 — — — — — -30 — 17.4% -2.65 1–0 — — +1.06
1971 1559 96.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 — — +1.40 1971 1409 98.8 — — — — — -28 +108 25.0% -2.04 2–2 (50%) — — +0.47
1972 1486 99.3 — — — — — — +28 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.70 1972 1387 101.5 — — — — — -37 — 28.6% -1.07 0–2 — — +0.62
1973 1484 105.1 — — — — — +40 +9 42.9% -0.33 0–1 1–1 — +1.64 1973 1444 103.7 — — — — — -20 — 53.3% -0.07 1–0 1–0 — +0.90
1974 1487 112.0 — — — — — +32 +10 35.0% -0.90 1–1 1–0 — +0.34 1974 1470 103.4 — — — — — -8 — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 — — +0.25
1975 1499 103.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.24 1975 1493 105.1 — — — — — 0 — 50.0% +0.20 1–1 — — +0.60
1976 1509 110.2 — — — — — +40 — 41.2% -0.30 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.95 1976 1487 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09
1977 1507 99.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1978 1497 102.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 1487 98.7 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.43 1–0 — — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1582 108.0 — — — — — +20 +17 42.4% -0.33 7–9 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 98.3 +14.58 Career 1529 97.4 — — — — +11 -18 +108 33.1% -1.40 11–6 (65%) 1–0 — +5.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.