Monique Van Haver
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gail Sherriff | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 9, 1976 | H2H |
| Kazuko Sawamatsu | 0 | 3 | 3 | Dec 6, 1974 | H2H |
| Janet Young | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 13, 1973 | H2H |
| Michele Gurdal | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 1, 1972 | H2H |
| Monica Simmen | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 7, 1978 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Monique Van Haver and Monica Simmen are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Monica Simmen leads 1–0 on carpet, while Monique Van Haver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Monique Van Haver won the 1978 Monte Carlo round of 64 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monique Van Haver | 6-0 6-2 | Monica Simmen | Match data | Apr 7, 1978* | R64 | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Monica Simmen | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Monique Van Haver | Match data | Feb 16, 1977* | SF | Zurich | WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monique Van Haver | — | — | — | 1,581 | 30 | 38 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Monica Simmen | — | — | — | 1,547 | 11 | 18 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Monique Van Haver | Monica Simmen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 8–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Monique Van Haver | Monica Simmen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1968 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1969 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1970 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 0 | 6 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1971 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1979 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1972 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1973 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 15 | 19 | 34 | 44.1% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | Career | — | — | — | — | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Monique Van Haver | Monica Simmen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1968 | 1493 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +2 | — | 41.7% | -0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.29 | 1976 | 1494 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| 1969 | 1447 | 87.3 | — | — | — | — | — | -11 | — | 14.3% | -3.29 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.40 | 1977 | 1534 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | +85 | — | — | 53.8% | +0.08 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 100.8 | +1.20 |
| 1970 | 1569 | 116.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +2 | — | 94.1% | +3.35 | 1–0 | — | — | +2.37 | 1978 | 1483 | 93.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.7% | -2.67 | — | — | — | +0.76 |
| 1971 | 1559 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.30 | 1–1 | — | — | +1.40 | 1979 | 1483 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.00 | — | — | — | +0.77 |
| 1972 | 1486 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | 20.0% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.70 | 1980 | 1488 | 106.9 | — | — | — | — | — | -4 | — | 45.5% | 0.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.72 |
| 1973 | 1484 | 105.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +40 | +9 | 42.9% | -0.33 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +1.64 | 1981 | 1477 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | -8 | — | 43.5% | -0.35 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–0 | — | +0.33 |
| 1974 | 1487 | 112.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +32 | +10 | 35.0% | -0.90 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 1499 | 103.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 1509 | 110.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | 41.2% | -0.30 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 1507 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 1497 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | — | — | — | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 1487 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.43 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1582 | 108.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +20 | +17 | 42.4% | -0.33 | 7–9 (44%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.3 | +14.58 | Career | 1548 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | +85 | -7 | — | 40.0% | -0.82 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.1 | +13.07 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gail Sherriff | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 9, 1976 | H2H |
| Kazuko Sawamatsu | 0 | 3 | 3 | Dec 6, 1974 | H2H |
| Janet Young | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 13, 1973 | H2H |
| Michele Gurdal | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 1, 1972 | H2H |
| Monica Simmen | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 7, 1978 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcela Skuherska | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 20, 1981 | H2H |
| Kerstin Seelbach | 2 | 0 | 2 | Mar 14, 1980 | H2H |
| Monique Van Haver | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 7, 1978 | H2H |
| Nina Bohm | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 20, 1981 | H2H |
| Barbara Rossi | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 20, 1981 | H2H |