H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Alexandra Fusai H2H: 1-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 1–0 lead over Alexandra Fusai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2001 US Open round of 128 6-4 6-7(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Alexandra Fusai
FRA Age 52 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Petrova #38 6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 Alexandra Fusai #143 Match data Aug 29, 2001* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13
Alexandra Fusai #1,030 #37 691 1,765 89 147 37.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Alexandra Fusai
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #275 1,489 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0 1991 0–2 0.0% #195 1,464 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1992 4–10 28.6% #131 1,454 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1993 16–17 48.5% #79 1,582 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0 1994 10–16 38.5% #92 1,567 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0 1995 6–12 33.3% #105 1,540 0 0
22 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0 1996 12–17 41.4% #59 1,554 0 0
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1 1997 17–17 50.0% #50 1,669 0 0
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6 1998 15–21 41.7% #39 1,675 0 0
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7 1999 3–16 15.8% #177 1,528 0 0
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9 2000 2–4 33.3% #144 1,528 0 0
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9 2001 2–10 16.7% #142 1,458 0 0
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9 2002 2–4 33.3% #197 1,478 0 0
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Petrova Alexandra Fusai
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 7 7 14 50.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2002 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 5 7 12 41.7% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 7 5 12 58.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1998 2 6 8 25.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
25 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2001 1 8 9 11.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0% — 24 47 71 33.8% 56 68 124 45.2% 3 14 17 17.6% 6 18 24 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Petrova Alexandra Fusai
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1536 108.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 — -0.21 1990 1490 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.07
17 1999 1568 119.8 — — — — +27 — — 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 — -0.10 1991 1464 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–1 — +0.24
18 2000 1625 137.4 — — — — +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 -0.47 1992 1454 95.4 — — — — +37 +46 — 31.3% -1.28 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.98
19 2001 1683 138.0 — — — — -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) 96.0 -0.89 1993 1583 122.7 — — — — -44 +34 — 45.6% -0.38 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 106.7 +0.89
20 2002 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 — — 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 — -1.69 1994 1567 122.2 — — — — -107 +148 — 42.9% -0.59 0–4 (0%) 5–4 (56%) 96.7 +0.38
21 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 105.2 -2.56 1995 1541 107.2 — — — — -97 +127 — 36.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.60
22 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 95.7 +1.78 1996 1554 117.4 — — — — -53 +78 -36 39.7% -0.79 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 103.7 +1.06
23 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 102.6 +1.08 1997 1669 128.1 — — — — -64 +31 -163 48.0% -0.37 7–4 (64%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 -0.24
24 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 — 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 +2.64 1998 1676 126.1 — — — — -135 +112 -154 41.3% -0.82 5–3 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 103.4 -0.94
25 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) 101.3 -0.25 1999 1529 103.0 — — — — -38 +137 -91 22.7% -2.34 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.19
26 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) 94.7 +0.54 2000 1528 107.4 — — — — -23 +112 — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 — — +0.15
27 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 100.8 +1.28 2001 1459 97.2 — — — — -24 +150 — 27.6% -1.59 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — +0.15
28 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 -0.43 2002 1479 113.9 — — — — — +111 — 38.5% -0.15 0–1 — — -0.16
29 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 97.5 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 102.3 +2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 — 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 — — 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59 — 1766 120.9 — — — — -61 +92 -114 39.1% -0.86 35–34 (51%) 28–30 (48%) 103.7 +1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.