H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Alona Bondarenko H2H: 3-2

Nadia Petrova holds a 3–2 lead over Alona Bondarenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Alona Bondarenko leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2010 Beijing third round 6-3 7-5.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
UKR Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 7, 2010* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #17 6-3 7-5 Alona Bondarenko #31 Match data
Oct 23, 2009* Moscow WTA 500 R16 Hard Alona Bondarenko #36 7-6(3) 6-3 Nadia Petrova #17 Match data
Aug 12, 2009* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Alona Bondarenko #34 6-2 6-3 Nadia Petrova #10 Match data
Apr 11, 2009* Ponte Vedra Beach WTA 250 QF Clay Nadia Petrova #10 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) Alona Bondarenko #37 Match data
Apr 13, 2006* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #7 6-1 0-6 6-2 Alona Bondarenko #80 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Alona Bondarenko #1,151 #19 2,020 1,872 154 143 51.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Alona Bondarenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #187 1,472 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #110 1,482 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 2005 13–16 44.8% #79 1,528 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2006 24–22 52.2% #32 1,689 0 1
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2007 33–24 57.9% #21 1,765 0 1
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2008 25–20 55.6% #33 1,785 0 1
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2009 30–25 54.5% #32 1,781 0 1
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2010 24–19 55.8% #36 1,732 0 2
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2011 4–14 22.2% #257 1,565 0 2
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13