H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 2-2

Nadia Petrova and Amanda Coetzer are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2003 US Open round of 32 6-0 6-1.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 2
4 main-draw meetings
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Petrova #19 6-0 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #16 Match data Aug 31, 2003* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Nadia Petrova #24 6-3 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #15 Match data Jul 31, 2003* R32 San Diego Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #26 6-2 6-1 Nadia Petrova #145 Match data Oct 5, 2002* QF Moscow Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Amanda Coetzer #10 4-6 7-5 6-4 Nadia Petrova #90 Match data Apr 14, 2001* SF Amelia Island Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2
22 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Petrova Amanda Coetzer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0% 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
26 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
29 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
31 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0% 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 414/630 of Nadia Petrova's and 7/51 of Amanda Coetzer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nadia Petrova Amanda Coetzer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 12/56 3.7 3.3 56.6% 70.3% 47.3% 61.6% 49.4% 60.0% 51.0% —/—
22 2004 10/65 4.7 4.2 56.8% 69.4% 49.1% 44.6% 40.1% 60.7% 44.9% —/—
23 2005 22/81 3.9 3.4 60.3% 69.7% 48.9% 61.7% 50.8% 61.3% 47.2% —/—
24 2006 50/67 5.1 2.7 61.5% 71.4% 51.1% 58.4% 48.2% 63.7% 47.6% —/—
25 2007 49/55 4.4 3.1 61.8% 71.9% 48.2% 58.1% 47.0% 62.6% 45.1% —/—
26 2008 63/71 4.7 3.7 60.3% 70.4% 44.7% 57.0% 53.9% 60.4% 45.5% —/—
27 2009 47/51 6.2 3.7 58.3% 70.3% 46.5% 50.8% 44.7% 60.2% 42.2% —/—
28 2010 47/52 6.2 3.3 57.1% 71.5% 48.2% 63.1% 51.9% 61.5% 43.1% —/—
29 2011 41/46 4.2 3.0 58.5% 66.6% 48.1% 55.9% 52.2% 59.1% 42.1% —/—
30 2012 45/58 6.0 3.0 55.3% 70.5% 46.7% 51.0% 48.8% 60.0% 44.4% —/—
31 2013 22/22 6.3 3.0 60.4% 67.2% 41.1% 51.9% 43.8% 57.1% 44.5% 2003 5/46 0.6 2.6 67.1% 60.3% 44.8% 58.0% 41.1% 55.6% 43.5%
32 2014 6/6 5.3 5.5 46.7% 66.9% 45.9% 48.3% 39.9% 54.2% 42.2% 2004 2/5 0.0 1.0 71.5% 51.7% 48.7% 53.3% 75.0% 50.9% 54.3%
Career 414/722 5.2 3.3 58.9% 70.2% 47.3% 56.2% 49.0% 60.8% 44.7% 7/807 0.4 2.1 68.3% 57.8% 45.9% 56.7% 50.8% 54.2% 46.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Petrova Amanda Coetzer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1536 108.3 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 -0.21 1988 1537 112.0 +42 63.6% +0.55 0–1 +0.21
17 1999 1568 119.8 +27 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 -0.10 1989 1674 132.8 -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 -0.21
18 2000 1625 137.4 +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 -0.47 1990 1662 126.6 +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00
19 2001 1683 138.0 -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) 96.0 -0.89 1991 1685 139.7 -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77
20 2002 1745 137.3 -48 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 -1.69 1992 1865 153.9 -32 +16 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99
21 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 105.2 -2.56 1993 1994 160.0 +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59
22 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 95.7 +1.78 1994 1886 153.6 -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72
23 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 102.6 +1.08 1995 1907 160.6 0 +74 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38
24 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 +2.64 1996 1856 161.7 +2 +111 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
25 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) 101.3 -0.25 1997 2014 167.3 -43 +103 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54
26 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) 94.7 +0.54 1998 1888 157.3 +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.82
27 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 100.8 +1.28 1999 1816 156.1 +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50
28 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 -0.43 2000 1895 157.2 -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42
29 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 97.5 +0.59 2001 1786 143.1 -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01
30 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 102.3 +2.25 2002 1795 147.3 +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05
31 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 +0.77 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51
32 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 -0.14 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 36.4% -0.36 1–0 -0.28
Career 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.