H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nadia Petrova vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 4-6
Amélie Mauresmo holds a 6–4 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 4–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2007 Eastbourne semifinal 6-4 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4
–
6
10 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2007* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-4 (ret.) | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2007* | Paris | WTA 500 | SF | Carpet | Nadia Petrova | 5-7 6-4 7-6(7) | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Nov 6, 2006 | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-2 6-2 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2006* | Miami | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-3 6-1 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Mar 5, 2006* | Doha | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-3 7-5 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2006* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-4 7-5 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2005* | Filderstadt | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2005 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 4-6 7-5 2-0 (ret.) | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| May 7, 2005* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Nadia Petrova | 6-2 6-3 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2005* | Paris | WTA 500 | SF | Carpet | Amélie Mauresmo | 7-5 6-3 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | #578 | #3 | 3,882 | 2,077 | 441 | 276 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 13 |
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,217 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nadia Petrova | Amélie Mauresmo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #112 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2003 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #12 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,060 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2005 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #9 | 1,945 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,061 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,990 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 56–11 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,175 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 2007 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #14 | 1,931 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,127 | 0 | 19 |
| 26 | 2008 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,135 | 2 | 23 |
| 27 | 2009 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,960 | 2 | 24 |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #15 | 1,828 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,815 | 2 | 24 |
| 29 | 2011 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #29 | 1,781 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,871 | 2 | 25 |
| 30 | 2012 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,718 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #362 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |