H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 2-1

Nadia Petrova holds a 2–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2012 's Hertogenbosch fourth round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 2012* 's Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R16 Grass Nadia Petrova #22 7-5 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #28 Match data
Feb 20, 2008* Doha WTA 1000 R64 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 6-2 1-2 (ret.) Nadia Petrova #16 Match data
Feb 17, 2005* Antwerp WTA 500 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #12 6-4 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —