H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nadia Petrova vs Anna Kournikova H2H: 1-1
Nadia Petrova and Anna Kournikova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2002 Moscow fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2002* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Nadia Petrova | (w/o) | Anna Kournikova | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2000* | Luxembourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Anna Kournikova | 1-6 7-5 4-1 (ret.) | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | #578 | #3 | 3,882 | 2,077 | 441 | 276 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 13 |
| Anna Kournikova | #606 | #8 | 2,158 | 2,072 | 184 | 120 | 60.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nadia Petrova | Anna Kournikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #289 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #65 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,971 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #112 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #35 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #12 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #9 | 1,945 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,990 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #14 | 1,931 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #15 | 1,828 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #29 | 1,781 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,718 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #362 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |