H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Anne Kremer H2H: 2-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2008 Australian Open second round 7-5 7-5.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 0
2 main-draw meetings
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Petrova #14 7-5 7-5 Anne Kremer #84 Match data Jan 17, 2008* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Nadia Petrova #61 6-3 2-6 4-2 (ret.) Anne Kremer #35 Match data May 25, 2000* R32 Strasbourg Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0
22 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2
30 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Petrova Anne Kremer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0% 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2003 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
29 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
35 2011 2 5 7 28.6%
Career 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0% 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 414/630 of Nadia Petrova's and 41/71 of Anne Kremer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nadia Petrova Anne Kremer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 12/56 3.7 3.3 56.6% 70.3% 47.3% 61.6% 49.4% 60.0% 51.0% —/—
22 2004 10/65 4.7 4.2 56.8% 69.4% 49.1% 44.6% 40.1% 60.7% 44.9% —/—
23 2005 22/81 3.9 3.4 60.3% 69.7% 48.9% 61.7% 50.8% 61.3% 47.2% —/—
24 2006 50/67 5.1 2.7 61.5% 71.4% 51.1% 58.4% 48.2% 63.7% 47.6% —/—
25 2007 49/55 4.4 3.1 61.8% 71.9% 48.2% 58.1% 47.0% 62.6% 45.1% —/—
26 2008 63/71 4.7 3.7 60.3% 70.4% 44.7% 57.0% 53.9% 60.4% 45.5% —/—
27 2009 47/51 6.2 3.7 58.3% 70.3% 46.5% 50.8% 44.7% 60.2% 42.2% —/—
28 2010 47/52 6.2 3.3 57.1% 71.5% 48.2% 63.1% 51.9% 61.5% 43.1% —/—
29 2011 41/46 4.2 3.0 58.5% 66.6% 48.1% 55.9% 52.2% 59.1% 42.1% 2005 5/18 2.4 1.6 69.3% 58.4% 35.9% 47.0% 58.1% 51.0% 43.0%
30 2012 45/58 6.0 3.0 55.3% 70.5% 46.7% 51.0% 48.8% 60.0% 44.4% 2006 5/12 0.8 3.0 62.0% 50.4% 41.6% 42.4% 30.3% 47.5% 42.1%
31 2013 22/22 6.3 3.0 60.4% 67.2% 41.1% 51.9% 43.8% 57.1% 44.5% 2007 12/20 1.3 2.7 70.8% 54.9% 43.4% 43.1% 45.8% 51.6% 42.4%
32 2014 6/6 5.3 5.5 46.7% 66.9% 45.9% 48.3% 39.9% 54.2% 42.2% 2008 9/10 1.0 3.8 62.2% 52.5% 39.7% 44.1% 42.5% 47.5% 42.9%
33 —/— 2009 3/4 0.7 4.7 60.9% 59.4% 32.9% 41.7% 30.0% 49.0% 36.5%
35 —/— 2011 7/7 1.7 2.6 66.0% 52.0% 38.2% 34.7% 59.6% 47.4% 38.2%
Career 414/722 5.2 3.3 58.9% 70.2% 47.3% 56.2% 49.0% 60.8% 44.7% 41/333 1.3 3.0 66.1% 54.1% 39.8% 42.2% 45.9% 49.2% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Petrova Anne Kremer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1536 108.3 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 -0.21
17 1999 1568 119.8 +27 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 -0.10
18 2000 1625 137.4 +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 -0.47
19 2001 1683 138.0 -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) 96.0 -0.89 1995 1517 108.3 50.0% 0.00 -0.09
20 2002 1745 137.3 -48 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 -1.69 1996 1508 105.0 +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 -0.12
21 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 105.2 -2.56 1997 1509 117.6 +41 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) -0.53
22 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 95.7 +1.78 1998 1552 126.8 +35 36.4% -1.09 1–0 -0.65
23 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 102.6 +1.08 1999 1640 130.5 -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35
24 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 +2.64 2000 1708 137.5 -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80
25 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) 101.3 -0.25 2001 1695 135.0 +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14
26 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) 94.7 +0.54 2002 1671 136.3 -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24
27 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 100.8 +1.28 2003 1635 94.6 -26 33.3% -1.33 +0.58
28 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 -0.43 2004 1606 116.6 -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32
29 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 97.5 +0.59 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 +0.09
30 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 102.3 +2.25 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 -0.81
31 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 +0.77 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 -0.03
32 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 -0.14 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 +0.27
33 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 14.3% -2.57 0–1 -0.74
35 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 +0.19
Career 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.