H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Anne Kremer H2H: 2-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2008 Australian Open second round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 17, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #14 7-5 7-5 Anne Kremer #84 Match data
May 25, 2000* Strasbourg WTA 500 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #61 6-3 2-6 4-2 (ret.) Anne Kremer #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2