H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Catalina Castano H2H: 3-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 3–0 lead over Catalina Castano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2006 Charleston quarterfinal 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Catalina Castano
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 15, 2006* Charleston WTA 1000 QF Clay Nadia Petrova #7 6-2 6-0 Catalina Castano #48 Match data
May 26, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Nadia Petrova #8 6-2 6-3 Catalina Castano #102 Match data
Aug 27, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nadia Petrova #19 6-4 6-0 Catalina Castano #149 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Catalina Castano #1,073 #35 623 1,703 83 109 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Catalina Castano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #232 1,484 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 2000 1–1 50.0% #110 1,487 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2001 5–9 35.7% #144 1,489 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2002 3–2 60.0% #194 1,513 0 0
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2003 2–3 40.0% #135 1,518 0 0
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2004 5–8 38.5% #113 1,541 0 0
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2005 22–18 55.0% #57 1,661 0 0
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2006 22–25 46.8% #54 1,544 0 0
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2007 10–20 33.3% #112 1,508 0 0
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2008 5–10 33.3% #142 1,497 0 0
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2009 0–2 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2010 5–5 50.0% #189 1,500 0 0
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2011 2–1 66.7% #254 1,514 0 0
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 2012 1–2 33.3% #232 1,511 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2013 0–2 0.0% #202 1,489 0 0