H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 2-1

Nadia Petrova holds a 2–1 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2003 Philadelphia quarterfinal 7-6(5) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 1, 2003* Philadelphia WTA 500 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #12 7-6(5) 7-5 Chanda Rubin #10 Match data
Oct 25, 2002* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #14 6-2 6-4 Nadia Petrova #114 Match data
Apr 12, 2001* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #90 4-6 6-4 6-0 Chanda Rubin #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —