H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 2-3 (incl. walkovers)

Nadia Petrova vs Conchita Martínez: 2–2 excluding walkovers; 2–3 including 1 walkover. Across 5 main-draw results including walkovers, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2005 Zurich round of 32 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H including walkovers
2 – 3
5 main-draw results
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Petrova #9 6-4 7-6(5) Conchita Martínez #37 Match data Oct 20, 2005* R32 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Conchita Martínez #47 (w/o) Nadia Petrova #9 Match data May 13, 2005* R16 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Conchita Martínez #24 6-3 6-1 Nadia Petrova #7 Match data Apr 17, 2004* QF Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Nadia Petrova #123 6-1 6-4 Conchita Martínez #13 Match data Oct 21, 1999* R32 Kremlin Cup Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Conchita Martínez #7 6-0 6-0 Nadia Petrova #175 Match data Oct 24, 1998* R16 Kremlin Cup Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16
22 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32
30 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32
33 — — — — — — — 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Petrova Conchita Martínez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
17 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
19 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
20 2002 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
21 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3%
22 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0% 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
26 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
Career — 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0% — 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 414/630 of Nadia Petrova's and 18/135 of Conchita Martínez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nadia Petrova Conchita Martínez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 12/56 3.7 3.3 56.6% 70.3% 47.3% 61.6% 49.4% 60.0% 51.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 10/65 4.7 4.2 56.8% 69.4% 49.1% 44.6% 40.1% 60.7% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 22/81 3.9 3.4 60.3% 69.7% 48.9% 61.7% 50.8% 61.3% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 50/67 5.1 2.7 61.5% 71.4% 51.1% 58.4% 48.2% 63.7% 47.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 49/55 4.4 3.1 61.8% 71.9% 48.2% 58.1% 47.0% 62.6% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 63/71 4.7 3.7 60.3% 70.4% 44.7% 57.0% 53.9% 60.4% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 47/51 6.2 3.7 58.3% 70.3% 46.5% 50.8% 44.7% 60.2% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 47/52 6.2 3.3 57.1% 71.5% 48.2% 63.1% 51.9% 61.5% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 41/46 4.2 3.0 58.5% 66.6% 48.1% 55.9% 52.2% 59.1% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 45/58 6.0 3.0 55.3% 70.5% 46.7% 51.0% 48.8% 60.0% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 22/22 6.3 3.0 60.4% 67.2% 41.1% 51.9% 43.8% 57.1% 44.5% 2003 10/50 1.5 3.6 58.2% 62.7% 46.9% 50.8% 52.5% 55.9% 49.1%
32 2014 6/6 5.3 5.5 46.7% 66.9% 45.9% 48.3% 39.9% 54.2% 42.2% 2004 4/37 3.0 3.8 57.1% 64.2% 49.7% 52.7% 37.0% 58.0% 42.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 4/48 2.3 3.3 60.9% 58.0% 45.4% 59.9% 60.8% 52.9% 44.2%
Career — 414/722 5.2 3.3 58.9% 70.2% 47.3% 56.2% 49.0% 60.8% 44.7% — 18/955 2.0 3.6 58.6% 62.0% 47.2% 53.2% 50.9% 55.7% 46.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Petrova Conchita Martínez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1536 108.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 — -0.21 1988 1730 145.2 — — — — -22 -81 — 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57
17 1999 1568 119.8 — — — — +27 — — 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 — -0.10 1989 1928 154.3 — — — — -62 -75 — 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51
18 2000 1625 137.4 — — — — +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 -0.47 1990 2062 158.8 — — — — -43 -68 — 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28
19 2001 1683 138.0 — — — — -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) 96.0 -0.89 1991 2076 163.5 — — — — -95 +132 — 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74
20 2002 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 — — 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 — -1.69 1992 2058 170.3 — — — — -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06
21 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 105.2 -2.56 1993 2160 168.9 — — — — -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51
22 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 95.7 +1.78 1994 2065 167.5 — — — — -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84
23 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 102.6 +1.08 1995 2182 174.1 — — — — -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30
24 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 — 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 +2.64 1996 2067 172.1 — — — — -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86
25 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) 101.3 -0.25 1997 2010 168.8 — — — — +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78
26 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) 94.7 +0.54 1998 1968 163.0 — — — — -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15
27 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 100.8 +1.28 1999 1898 159.2 — — — — -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25
28 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 -0.43 2000 1923 160.0 — — — — -33 +232 — 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60
29 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 97.5 +0.59 2001 1844 131.6 — — — — -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93
30 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 102.3 +2.25 2002 1756 136.7 — — — — +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17
31 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 — 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 +0.77 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01
32 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 — — 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.14 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48
50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1772 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1745 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59 — 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.