H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 2-3

Conchita Martínez holds a 3–2 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2005 Zurich third round 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 20, 2005* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #9 6-4 7-6(5) Conchita Martínez #37 Match data
May 13, 2005* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #47 (w/o) Nadia Petrova #9 Match data
Apr 17, 2004* Charleston WTA 1000 QF Clay Conchita Martínez #24 6-3 6-1 Nadia Petrova #7 Match data
Oct 21, 1999* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Nadia Petrova #123 6-1 6-4 Conchita Martínez #13 Match data
Oct 24, 1998* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Conchita Martínez #7 6-0 6-0 Nadia Petrova #175 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 — — — — — — — 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33