H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Elena Likhovtseva H2H: 4-3

Nadia Petrova holds a 4–3 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Elena Likhovtseva leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2006 Moscow fourth round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Elena Likhovtseva
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 13, 2006* Moscow WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Nadia Petrova #5 6-3 7-5 Elena Likhovtseva #40 Match data
Oct 7, 2005* Filderstadt WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #9 6-1 6-1 Elena Likhovtseva #16 Match data
Oct 29, 2004* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #13 6-2 5-7 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #24 Match data
Aug 5, 2004* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #39 6-4 6-7(6) 7-5 Nadia Petrova #15 Match data
Jul 28, 2004* San Diego WTA 1000 R64 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #35 6-4 1-6 6-4 Nadia Petrova #12 Match data
Apr 3, 2003* Sarasota WTA 250 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #109 6-4 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #30 Match data
Aug 30, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #27 6-4 2-6 6-4 Nadia Petrova #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Elena Likhovtseva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3