H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nadia Petrova vs Jennifer Capriati H2H: 1-3
Jennifer Capriati holds a 3–1 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jennifer Capriati leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jennifer Capriati won the 2004 Wimbledon fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Jennifer Capriati | 6-4 6-4 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Nadia Petrova | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Jennifer Capriati | Match data |
| May 16, 2003* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Jennifer Capriati | 7-5 6-3 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2001* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Jennifer Capriati | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | #578 | #3 | 3,882 | 2,077 | 441 | 276 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 13 |
| Jennifer Capriati | #54 | #1 | 5,123 | 2,216 | 405 | 170 | 70.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nadia Petrova | Jennifer Capriati | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 37–11 | 77.1% | #8 | 1,961 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #6 | 2,194 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,159 | 0 | 4 |
| 17 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,142 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #42 | 2,119 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 2001 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #112 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #36 | 2,068 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2003 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #12 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2005 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #9 | 1,945 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,990 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,906 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2007 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #14 | 1,931 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,094 | 2 | 11 |
| 26 | 2008 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #3 | 2,019 | 3 | 12 |
| 27 | 2009 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #6 | 2,022 | 3 | 13 |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #15 | 1,828 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 2,019 | 3 | 13 |
| 29 | 2011 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #29 | 1,781 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,718 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #362 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |