H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Jill Craybas H2H: 4-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 4–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2012 Charleston third round 2-6 7-6(6) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 5, 2012* Charleston WTA 500 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #35 2-6 7-6(6) 6-2 Jill Craybas #137 Match data
Aug 11, 2005* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #9 6-3 6-1 Jill Craybas #59 Match data
Apr 13, 2001* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Nadia Petrova #90 6-1 7-6(6) Jill Craybas #112 Match data
Mar 1, 2001* Scottsdale WTA 500 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #72 6-3 6-4 Jill Craybas #123 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1