H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 1-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2000 Miami Open round of 64 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Julie Halard-Decugis
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Petrova #75 6-2 6-3 Julie Halard-Decugis #9 Match data Mar 22, 2000* R64 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,024 340 221 60.6% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Julie Halard-Decugis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,612 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,624 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,707 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,820 0 1
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0 1992 23–14 62.2% #27 1,819 0 2
22 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,819 0 2
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,889 0 3
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,916 0 8
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,930 0 10
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10 2000 31–24 56.4% #15 1,837 0 12
30 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Petrova Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 10 6 16 62.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 2002 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 26 13 39 66.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 19 11 30 63.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 19 14 33 57.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0% 1996 13 4 17 76.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
26 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1998 18 12 30 60.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1999 22 11 33 66.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 18 13 31 58.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0% — 164 109 273 60.1% 117 62 179 65.4% 31 17 48 64.6% 28 33 61 45.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Petrova Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1536 108.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 — -0.21 1987 1643 124.0 — — — — -39 +21 — 58.8% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 5–1 (83%) 107.7 +1.12
17 1999 1568 119.8 — — — — +27 — — 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 — -0.10 1988 1612 123.0 — — — — -40 +60 -85 45.0% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 2–7 (22%) 95.8 -0.31
18 2000 1625 137.4 — — — — +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 -0.47 1989 1625 118.1 — — — — -29 -13 — 39.7% -0.70 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 -0.36
19 2001 1683 138.0 — — — — -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) 96.0 -0.89 1990 1708 138.4 — — — — -46 +7 -172 52.9% +0.32 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 102.8 -1.86
20 2002 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 — — 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 — -1.69 1991 1821 141.7 — — — — -31 +28 -239 59.2% +0.73 18–5 (78%) 5–1 (83%) 112.4 +1.15
21 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 105.2 -2.56 1992 1819 144.0 — — — — -103 +139 -169 57.1% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 3–5 (38%) 104.1 -1.82
22 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 95.7 +1.78 1993 1819 145.9 — — — — +15 +29 — 59.2% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 105.4 +1.92
23 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 102.6 +1.08 1994 1890 153.5 — — — — -51 +106 — 60.0% +0.46 14–8 (64%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.05
24 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 — 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 +2.64 1995 1771 131.9 — — — — -28 +220 — 55.1% +0.33 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.1 +0.60
25 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) 101.3 -0.25 1996 1856 152.1 — — — — -18 +132 — 69.0% +1.29 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 -0.28
26 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) 94.7 +0.54 1997 1843 108.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
27 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 100.8 +1.28 1998 1917 157.6 — — — — -29 +48 -109 60.5% +0.78 7–7 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 100.1 -3.44
28 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 -0.43 1999 1930 160.9 — — — — -32 +91 -17 63.8% +0.88 14–5 (74%) 8–4 (67%) 110.3 +0.13
29 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 97.5 +0.59 2000 1837 145.6 — — — — +5 +79 +214 52.5% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 102.6 +1.49
30 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 102.3 +2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 — 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 — — 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59 — 2024 152.3 — — — — -27 +76 -46 57.5% +0.49 110–64 (63%) 67–50 (57%) 111.7 -0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.