H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nadia Petrova vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 1-0
Nadia Petrova holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2000 Miami second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2000* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-2 6-3 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | #578 | #3 | 3,882 | 2,077 | 441 | 276 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 13 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nadia Petrova | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #112 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #12 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #9 | 1,945 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,990 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2007 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #14 | 1,931 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2008 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2009 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #15 | 1,828 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2011 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #29 | 1,781 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2012 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,718 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #362 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |