H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nadia Petrova vs Justine Henin H2H: 2-13
Justine Henin holds a 13–2 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 9–1 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2010 Wimbledon third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
13
15 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Justine Henin | 6-1 6-4 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Jan 28, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Justine Henin | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2010* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Justine Henin | 7-5 7-5 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2007 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Justine Henin | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2007* | Miami | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Justine Henin | 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Nov 6, 2006 | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-4 6-4 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| May 14, 2006* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Nadia Petrova | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Jan 14, 2006* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Justine Henin | (w/o) | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Justine Henin | 6-2 6-3 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| May 8, 2005* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Justine Henin | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Sep 7, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-3 6-2 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2003* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-4 6-4 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2003 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-3 7-5 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2003* | San Diego | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-0 6-2 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2003 | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Justine Henin | 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | #578 | #3 | 3,882 | 2,077 | 441 | 276 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 13 |
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nadia Petrova | Justine Henin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2001 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #112 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2003 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #12 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 2005 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #9 | 1,945 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 |
| 24 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,990 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 |
| 25 | 2007 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #14 | 1,931 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 |
| 26 | 2008 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 |
| 27 | 2009 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #15 | 1,828 | 0 | 9 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 |
| 29 | 2011 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #29 | 1,781 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 |
| 30 | 2012 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,718 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #362 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |