H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 7-1

Nadia Petrova holds a 7–1 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2010 Rome third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main draw meetings
Katarina Srebotnik
SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 6, 2010* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #18 6-4 6-4 Katarina Srebotnik #387 Match data
Sep 2, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nadia Petrova #13 6-3 6-3 Katarina Srebotnik #56 Match data
Oct 24, 2008* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #13 6-4 7-6(7) Katarina Srebotnik #21 Match data
May 7, 2008* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Nadia Petrova #22 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(2) Katarina Srebotnik #30 Match data
Feb 28, 2008* Dubai WTA 500 R32 Hard Katarina Srebotnik #28 6-4 6-4 Nadia Petrova #16 Match data
Aug 10, 2007* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #9 6-1 6-2 Katarina Srebotnik #22 Match data
Aug 3, 2007* San Diego WTA 1000 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #9 6-3 7-6(10) Katarina Srebotnik #23 Match data
Sep 25, 2003* Leipzig WTA 500 R32 Carpet Nadia Petrova #15 6-2 6-4 Katarina Srebotnik #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Katarina Srebotnik #704 #20 2,474 1,845 224 204 52.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Katarina Srebotnik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1999 11–11 50.0% #66 1,520 0 1
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2000 8–18 30.8% #120 1,484 0 1
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 2001 7–11 38.9% #97 1,512 0 1
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2002 28–18 60.9% #36 1,727 0 2
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2003 25–24 51.0% #39 1,682 0 2
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2004 13–18 41.9% #87 1,596 0 2
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2005 28–17 62.2% #27 1,752 0 4
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2006 30–24 55.6% #23 1,786 0 4
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2007 28–23 54.9% #27 1,756 0 4
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2008 41–25 62.1% #20 1,830 0 4
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2009 2–5 28.6% #428 1,740 0 4
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2010 3–10 23.1% #317 1,621 0 4
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —