H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 4-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 4–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2008 Cincinnati quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 2008* Cincinnati WTA 500 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #21 6-2 6-3 Lilia Osterloh #201 Match data
May 22, 2008* Istanbul WTA 500 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #28 6-1 6-2 Lilia Osterloh #114 Match data
Aug 9, 2007* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #9 7-5 6-3 Lilia Osterloh #81 Match data
May 17, 2001* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #60 7-5 6-0 Lilia Osterloh #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,697 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,551 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,595 0 0
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,659 0 0
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,509 0 0
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,543 0 0
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0