H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Lina Krasnoroutskaya H2H: 1-2

Lina Krasnoroutskaya holds a 2–1 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lina Krasnoroutskaya leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2003 Linz Open round of 16 4-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Lina Krasnoroutskaya
RUS Age 42 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Petrova #13 4-6 6-2 6-1 Lina Krasnoroutskaya #26 Match data Oct 24, 2003* R16 Linz Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lina Krasnoroutskaya #129 3-6 6-3 6-3 Nadia Petrova #111 Match data Jan 30, 2003* R32 Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Lina Krasnoroutskaya #72 6-4 6-4 Nadia Petrova #67 Match data Mar 8, 2001 R32 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13
Lina Krasnoroutskaya #424 #25 1,173 1,807 65 70 48.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Lina Krasnoroutskaya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1999 4–2 66.7% #165 1,579 0 0
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 2000 4–11 26.7% #132 1,537 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0 2001 20–17 54.1% #34 1,667 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 2002 7–7 50.0% #160 1,668 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2003 22–19 53.7% #28 1,770 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0 2004 7–13 35.0% #141 1,654 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #424 1,649 0 0
22 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6 — — — — — — —
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7 — — — — — — —
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9 — — — — — — —
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Petrova Lina Krasnoroutskaya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
16 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 14 8 22 63.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 2002 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0% — 36 37 73 49.3% 13 15 28 46.4% 9 10 19 47.4% 7 8 15 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Petrova Lina Krasnoroutskaya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1579 123.2 — — — — +28 — — 58.8% +0.41 3–2 (60%) — — -0.14
16 1998 1536 108.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 — -0.21 2000 1537 118.9 — — — — +43 -35 +79 36.1% -0.72 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) — 0.00
17 1999 1568 119.8 — — — — +27 — — 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 — -0.10 2001 1667 133.0 — — — — -42 -33 +4 52.5% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.24
18 2000 1625 137.4 — — — — +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.47 2002 1668 130.5 — — — — -18 — — 60.9% +0.78 1–0 3–2 (60%) — -0.27
19 2001 1683 138.0 — — — — -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) — -0.89 2003 1770 139.6 -1.59 +2.62 0.954 48.8% +1 -150 -121 49.5% -0.07 8–5 (62%) 4–6 (40%) — -3.07
20 2002 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 — — 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 — -1.69 2004 1654 119.7 +0.11 -0.29 0.998 49.9% +3 -25 -39 41.3% -0.57 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.12
21 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.56 2005 1649 102.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.06
22 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) — +1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — +1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 — 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) — +2.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) — +2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 — 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 — — 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59 — 1807 136.9 -0.95 +1.53 0.969 49.3% -8 -74 -14 48.8% -0.09 20–21 (49%) 15–20 (43%) 99.3 -2.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.