H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-7

Lindsay Davenport holds a 7–0 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 5–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2005 WTA Tour Championships round-robin match 6-2 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 7
7 main draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 7, 2005 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-2 7-6(1) Nadia Petrova #10 Match data
Apr 9, 2005* Amelia Island WTA 500 SF Clay Lindsay Davenport #1 6-0 6-3 Nadia Petrova #12 Match data
Jul 24, 2004* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #5 6-1 6-1 Nadia Petrova #12 Match data
Apr 10, 2004* Amelia Island WTA 500 SF Clay Lindsay Davenport #4 3-6 6-4 6-1 Nadia Petrova #9 Match data
Sep 2, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 6-0 6-7(6) 6-2 Nadia Petrova #19 Match data
Aug 9, 2001* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 7-6(3) 7-6(3) Nadia Petrova #38 Match data
Mar 25, 2000* Miami WTA 1000 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-1 Nadia Petrova #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54