H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 2-3

Lisa Raymond holds a 3–2 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2005 Indian Wells third round 6-7(7) 6-3 6-3.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 12, 2005* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #12 6-7(7) 6-3 6-3 Lisa Raymond #45 Match data
Oct 21, 2004* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #13 6-4 6-3 Lisa Raymond #27 Match data
Aug 27, 2004* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Lisa Raymond #36 3-6 6-4 6-4 Nadia Petrova #15 Match data
Jan 10, 2001* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Lisa Raymond #29 6-2 6-1 Nadia Petrova #62 Match data
Oct 22, 1999* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Lisa Raymond #40 6-2 6-2 Nadia Petrova #123 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,945 325 272 54.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Lisa Raymond
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,617 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,691 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,813 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,859 0 1
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,910 0 1
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,837 0 1
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,795 0 2
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,767 0 4
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2004 18–18 50.0% #30 1,746 0 4
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,631 0 4
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,580 0 4
33 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,563 0 4