H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs María Sánchez Lorenzo H2H: 1-1

Nadia Petrova and María Sánchez Lorenzo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, María Sánchez Lorenzo leads 1–0 on grass, while Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2006 Miami second round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
María Sánchez Lorenzo
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 22, 2006* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #7 6-2 6-1 María Sánchez Lorenzo #66 Match data
Jun 25, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass María Sánchez Lorenzo #49 7-5 6-1 Nadia Petrova #133 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
María Sánchez Lorenzo #1,067 #33 939 1,727 127 180 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova María Sánchez Lorenzo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1994 3–4 42.9% #131 1,521 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 1995 4–6 40.0% #125 1,554 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1996 4–11 26.7% #117 1,500 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1997 10–10 50.0% #53 1,636 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1998 10–21 32.3% #72 1,599 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1999 19–21 47.5% #41 1,670 0 1
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2000 9–15 37.5% #97 1,606 0 1
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2001 4–9 30.8% #214 1,566 0 1
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2002 2–5 28.6% #111 1,519 0 1
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2003 22–18 55.0% #42 1,655 0 1
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2004 22–25 46.8% #51 1,654 0 1
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2005 9–20 31.0% #83 1,530 0 1
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2006 9–15 37.5% #141 1,520 0 1
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —