H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Mariana Diaz-Oliva H2H: 4-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 4–0 lead over Mariana Diaz-Oliva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2006 Auckland third round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Mariana Diaz-Oliva
ARG Age 50 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 5, 2006* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #9 6-2 6-2 Mariana Diaz-Oliva #58 Match data
Jun 13, 2005 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R16 Grass Nadia Petrova #8 6-3 6-4 Mariana Diaz-Oliva #76 Match data
Aug 8, 2001* Los Angeles WTA 500 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #38 6-1 6-4 Mariana Diaz-Oliva #44 Match data
Apr 11, 2001* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Nadia Petrova #90 6-2 6-4 Mariana Diaz-Oliva #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Mariana Diaz-Oliva #452 #42 696 1,654 86 129 40.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Mariana Diaz-Oliva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #140 1,485 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1997 2–7 22.2% #106 1,479 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 1998 6–9 40.0% #95 1,484 0 0
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 1999 9–11 45.0% #107 1,516 0 0
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2000 4–8 33.3% #112 1,503 0 0
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2001 18–22 45.0% #55 1,549 0 0
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2002 11–15 42.3% #89 1,568 0 1
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2003 4–4 50.0% #172 1,582 0 1
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2004 5–9 35.7% #102 1,541 0 1
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2005 22–23 48.9% #58 1,606 0 1
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2006 5–20 20.0% #192 1,460 0 1
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —