H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Mary Pierce H2H: 2-1

Nadia Petrova holds a 2–1 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on clay, while Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2005 Berlin fourth round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 6, 2005* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Nadia Petrova #12 6-2 7-5 Mary Pierce #27 Match data
Mar 13, 2005* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Mary Pierce #33 6-2 6-2 Nadia Petrova #12 Match data
May 16, 2001* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Nadia Petrova #60 6-2 6-4 Mary Pierce #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —