H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Mary Pierce H2H: 2-2

Nadia Petrova and Mary Pierce are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on clay, while Mary Pierce leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2005 Berlin Open round of 16 6-2 7-5.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 2
4 main-draw meetings
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Petrova #12 6-2 7-5 Mary Pierce #27 Match data May 6, 2005* R16 Berlin Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Mary Pierce #33 6-2 6-2 Nadia Petrova #12 Match data Mar 12, 2005* R16 Indian Wells Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Mary Pierce #28 6-2 6-1 Nadia Petrova #14 Match data Aug 18, 2004* R32 Athens Olympics Olympics Hard
Nadia Petrova #60 6-2 6-4 Mary Pierce #17 Match data May 16, 2001* R64 Italian Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7
22 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16
30 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Petrova Mary Pierce
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
15 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
16 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% 12 4 16 75.0%
18 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 6 4 10 60.0%
19 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 12 5 17 70.6%
20 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3%
24 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0% 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
31 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2006 6 7 13 46.2% 3 1 4 75.0%
32 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0% 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 414/630 of Nadia Petrova's and 60/152 of Mary Pierce's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nadia Petrova Mary Pierce
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 12/56 3.7 3.3 56.6% 70.3% 47.3% 61.6% 49.4% 60.0% 51.0% —/—
22 2004 10/65 4.7 4.2 56.8% 69.4% 49.1% 44.6% 40.1% 60.7% 44.9% —/—
23 2005 22/81 3.9 3.4 60.3% 69.7% 48.9% 61.7% 50.8% 61.3% 47.2% —/—
24 2006 50/67 5.1 2.7 61.5% 71.4% 51.1% 58.4% 48.2% 63.7% 47.6% —/—
25 2007 49/55 4.4 3.1 61.8% 71.9% 48.2% 58.1% 47.0% 62.6% 45.1% —/—
26 2008 63/71 4.7 3.7 60.3% 70.4% 44.7% 57.0% 53.9% 60.4% 45.5% —/—
27 2009 47/51 6.2 3.7 58.3% 70.3% 46.5% 50.8% 44.7% 60.2% 42.2% —/—
28 2010 47/52 6.2 3.3 57.1% 71.5% 48.2% 63.1% 51.9% 61.5% 43.1% 2003 9/40 3.9 1.9 64.5% 68.8% 54.0% 63.9% 46.3% 63.3% 44.5%
29 2011 41/46 4.2 3.0 58.5% 66.6% 48.1% 55.9% 52.2% 59.1% 42.1% 2004 7/42 1.6 2.1 67.0% 71.4% 54.8% 59.0% 37.4% 66.4% 41.8%
30 2012 45/58 6.0 3.0 55.3% 70.5% 46.7% 51.0% 48.8% 60.0% 44.4% 2005 28/53 3.1 1.5 68.1% 68.9% 54.4% 59.1% 48.4% 64.3% 46.0%
31 2013 22/22 6.3 3.0 60.4% 67.2% 41.1% 51.9% 43.8% 57.1% 44.5% 2006 16/17 3.5 1.4 67.3% 69.2% 47.5% 52.5% 42.1% 62.2% 42.2%
32 2014 6/6 5.3 5.5 46.7% 66.9% 45.9% 48.3% 39.9% 54.2% 42.2% —/—
Career 414/722 5.2 3.3 58.9% 70.2% 47.3% 56.2% 49.0% 60.8% 44.7% 60/683 3.1 1.6 67.2% 69.2% 52.6% 58.1% 45.1% 63.9% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Petrova Mary Pierce
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1480 106.2 14.3% -2.43 0–1 -0.34
15 1990 1544 134.3 +3 +35 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.17
16 1998 1536 108.3 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 -0.21 1991 1786 146.7 -38 -56 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05
17 1999 1568 119.8 +27 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 -0.10 1992 1900 149.4 -37 -50 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22
18 2000 1625 137.4 +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 -0.47 1993 2003 165.9 -4 -109 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14
19 2001 1683 138.0 -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) 96.0 -0.89 1994 2055 169.7 -25 -54 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50
20 2002 1745 137.3 -48 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 -1.69 1995 2008 168.6 +34 -13 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10
21 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 105.2 -2.56 1996 1881 134.2 +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43
22 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 95.7 +1.78 1997 2066 169.1 -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07
23 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 102.6 +1.08 1998 2124 173.3 +36 -4 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64
24 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 +2.64 1999 2053 167.4 +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22
25 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) 101.3 -0.25 2000 2033 163.9 -27 +116 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29
26 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) 94.7 +0.54 2001 1839 112.0 +44 +254 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 +1.21
27 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 100.8 +1.28 2002 1752 124.6 +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57
28 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 -0.43 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38
29 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 97.5 +0.59 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86
30 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 102.3 +2.25 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66
31 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 +0.77 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) -0.83
32 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 -0.14
Career 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.