H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 4-1

Nadia Petrova holds a 4–1 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2007 Rome third round 7-6(5) 6-1.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2007* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #12 7-6(5) 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #55 Match data
Apr 7, 2006* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Nadia Petrova #7 6-1 6-3 Meghann Shaughnessy #84 Match data
Oct 30, 2004* Linz WTA 500 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #13 3-6 6-3 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #44 Match data
Jan 3, 2002* Gold Coast WTA 250 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #39 6-4 4-6 6-3 Meghann Shaughnessy #12 Match data
Mar 2, 2001* Scottsdale WTA 500 R16 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #27 7-6(7) 6-3 Nadia Petrova #72 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13