H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Monica Seles H2H: 2-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 2–0 lead over Monica Seles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2003 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Nadia Petrova #76 6-4 6-0 Monica Seles #12 Match data
May 15, 2003* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #88 6-3 4-1 (ret.) Monica Seles #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —