H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 6-2

Nadia Petrova holds a 6–2 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 5–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2008 Cincinnati final 6-2 6-1.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 2008* Cincinnati WTA 500 F Hard Nadia Petrova #21 6-2 6-1 Nathalie Dechy #92 Match data
Jun 22, 2007* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Nadia Petrova #11 7-5 7-5 Nathalie Dechy #48 Match data
Mar 21, 2007* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #7 6-4 3-6 7-6(2) Nathalie Dechy #44 Match data
Sep 29, 2006* Luxembourg WTA 500 R16 Hard Nathalie Dechy #36 6-4 6-3 Nadia Petrova #7 Match data
Oct 22, 2004* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #13 6-7(6) 6-4 6-3 Nathalie Dechy #22 Match data
Mar 29, 2004* Miami WTA 1000 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #11 6-2 6-2 Nathalie Dechy #25 Match data
Jan 10, 2004* Gold Coast WTA 250 SF Hard Nadia Petrova #12 7-6(1) 6-4 Nathalie Dechy #34 Match data
Jun 18, 2001 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R32 Grass Nathalie Dechy #37 6-3 6-4 Nadia Petrova #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Nathalie Dechy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13