H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 2-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 2–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2008 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nadia Petrova #14 6-1 6-3 Nicole Pratt #87 Match data
Jan 9, 2004* Gold Coast WTA 250 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #12 6-2 6-2 Nicole Pratt #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1