H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Nuria Llagostera Vives H2H: 1-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 1–0 lead over Nuria Llagostera Vives in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2005 Bangkok round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nuria Llagostera Vives
ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 156 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Petrova #9 6-1 6-2 Nuria Llagostera Vives #54 Match data Oct 13, 2005* R32 Bangkok Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13
Nuria Llagostera Vives #775 #35 968 1,685 78 111 41.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Nuria Llagostera Vives
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0 2000 4–6 40.0% #128 1,509 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0 2001 8–12 40.0% #103 1,500 0 0
22 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0 2002 1–8 11.1% #192 1,442 0 0
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1 2003 1–2 33.3% #140 1,450 0 0
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6 2004 4–6 40.0% #76 1,485 0 0
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7 2005 20–19 51.3% #50 1,617 0 1
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9 2006 6–5 54.5% #275 1,624 0 1
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9 2007 5–10 33.3% #145 1,557 0 1
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9 2008 14–11 56.0% #68 1,626 0 2
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10 2009 8–16 33.3% #146 1,562 0 2
30 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13 2010 4–7 36.4% #127 1,566 0 2
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13 2011 3–9 25.0% #131 1,550 0 2
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Petrova Nuria Llagostera Vives
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0% 2005 9 13 22 40.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 3 4 7 42.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 0 4 4 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0% — 28 48 76 36.8% 49 56 105 46.7% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 414/630 of Nadia Petrova's and 77/147 of Nuria Llagostera Vives's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nadia Petrova Nuria Llagostera Vives
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 12/56 3.7 3.3 56.6% 70.3% 47.3% 61.6% 49.4% 60.0% 51.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 10/65 4.7 4.2 56.8% 69.4% 49.1% 44.6% 40.1% 60.7% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 22/81 3.9 3.4 60.3% 69.7% 48.9% 61.7% 50.8% 61.3% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 50/67 5.1 2.7 61.5% 71.4% 51.1% 58.4% 48.2% 63.7% 47.6% 2004 1/10 2.0 6.0 50.8% 66.7% 31.3% 54.5% 27.3% 49.2% 40.6%
25 2007 49/55 4.4 3.1 61.8% 71.9% 48.2% 58.1% 47.0% 62.6% 45.1% 2005 5/39 1.6 5.8 52.8% 62.1% 45.5% 54.2% 37.3% 54.3% 44.2%
26 2008 63/71 4.7 3.7 60.3% 70.4% 44.7% 57.0% 53.9% 60.4% 45.5% 2006 2/11 1.0 2.5 47.8% 52.5% 40.4% 12.5% 28.6% 46.5% 39.3%
27 2009 47/51 6.2 3.7 58.3% 70.3% 46.5% 50.8% 44.7% 60.2% 42.2% 2007 9/15 0.3 3.4 55.8% 58.6% 43.0% 61.5% 50.2% 51.6% 45.8%
28 2010 47/52 6.2 3.3 57.1% 71.5% 48.2% 63.1% 51.9% 61.5% 43.1% 2008 17/25 1.4 4.6 53.5% 62.2% 47.0% 49.9% 51.9% 55.0% 45.3%
29 2011 41/46 4.2 3.0 58.5% 66.6% 48.1% 55.9% 52.2% 59.1% 42.1% 2009 21/24 1.2 5.7 50.7% 63.1% 40.0% 53.6% 47.6% 51.6% 43.8%
30 2012 45/58 6.0 3.0 55.3% 70.5% 46.7% 51.0% 48.8% 60.0% 44.4% 2010 10/11 0.7 4.3 54.1% 62.1% 42.3% 53.8% 48.4% 53.4% 39.3%
31 2013 22/22 6.3 3.0 60.4% 67.2% 41.1% 51.9% 43.8% 57.1% 44.5% 2011 12/12 1.3 5.8 49.8% 61.0% 42.0% 46.3% 40.8% 51.5% 44.2%
32 2014 6/6 5.3 5.5 46.7% 66.9% 45.9% 48.3% 39.9% 54.2% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 414/722 5.2 3.3 58.9% 70.2% 47.3% 56.2% 49.0% 60.8% 44.7% — 77/189 1.1 4.9 52.3% 61.6% 42.8% 51.6% 46.5% 52.6% 43.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Petrova Nuria Llagostera Vives
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1536 108.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1568 119.8 — — — — +27 — — 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1625 137.4 — — — — +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1683 138.0 — — — — -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) 96.0 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 — — 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 — -1.69 2000 1510 109.4 — — — — — +32 — 45.8% -0.33 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.01
21 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 105.2 -2.56 2001 1500 109.9 — — — — +59 +14 — 45.8% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 +0.82
22 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 95.7 +1.78 2002 1443 104.5 — — — — +95 -4 — 27.3% -1.77 0–4 (0%) — — -0.25
23 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 102.6 +1.08 2003 1450 110.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 0–2 — — -0.05
24 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 — 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 +2.64 2004 1486 108.9 -1.40 -1.05 0.800 45.0% +38 -8 — 44.0% -0.08 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 98.0 -0.15
25 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) 101.3 -0.25 2005 1618 123.7 -0.47 +0.31 0.967 49.5% -57 +62 — 49.4% -0.33 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 105.4 +0.18
26 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) 94.7 +0.54 2006 1625 118.7 -2.02 -1.39 0.733 42.6% -39 — — 58.3% +0.29 2–2 (50%) — — -0.05
27 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 100.8 +1.28 2007 1557 102.8 -2.20 +0.35 0.946 48.8% -23 +78 — 31.0% -1.21 0–1 1–1 — -0.03
28 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 -0.43 2008 1627 122.9 0.00 +0.20 1.006 50.2% -58 +58 — 55.4% +0.36 3–5 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 -0.25
29 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 97.5 +0.59 2009 1563 117.9 -2.95 +0.09 0.904 47.7% +2 +47 — 41.8% -0.65 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 98.4 -0.33
30 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 102.3 +2.25 2010 1567 113.6 -0.81 -2.10 0.844 47.0% -9 +56 — 36.0% -0.80 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.25
31 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 — 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 +0.77 2011 1551 125.4 -0.89 +0.18 0.911 48.0% -20 +59 — 32.1% -0.79 1–3 (25%) — — -1.00
32 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 — — 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59 — 1685 122.8 -1.41 -0.16 0.921 48.3% -20 +45 — 44.5% -0.46 22–41 (35%) 21–15 (58%) 97.7 -0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.