H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nadia Petrova vs Paola Suarez H2H: 2-2
Nadia Petrova and Paola Suarez are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Paola Suarez leads 2–0 on clay, while Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2004 Moscow third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2004* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Nadia Petrova | 7-5 6-4 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
| May 7, 2004* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Paola Suarez | 6-1 7-6(6) | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2003* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2001* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paola Suarez | 7-6(3) (ret.) | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | #578 | #3 | 3,882 | 2,077 | 441 | 276 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 13 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nadia Petrova | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #112 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #12 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #9 | 1,945 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,990 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #14 | 1,931 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2008 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2009 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #15 | 1,828 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2011 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #29 | 1,781 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2012 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 13 | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2013 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,718 | 0 | 13 | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #362 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |