H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Nadia Petrova vs Patty Schnyder H2H: 7-8
Patty Schnyder holds a 8–7 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, they are tied 6–6 on hard courts, while Patty Schnyder leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2010 Indian Wells second round 6-3 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
7
–
8
15 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 47
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2010* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
| May 15, 2009* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Patty Schnyder | 6-4 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2008* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-4 6-1 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2008* | Bali | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Patty Schnyder | 7-5 6-1 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2007 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-4 6-1 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
| Aug 4, 2007* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Patty Schnyder | 6-4 6-4 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Apr 16, 2006* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Nadia Petrova | 6-3 4-6 6-1 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
| Nov 7, 2005 | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Patty Schnyder | 6-0 5-7 6-4 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Oct 30, 2005* | Linz | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2003* | Linz | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-2 6-2 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Patty Schnyder | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Patty Schnyder | 7-6(6) 5-7 6-2 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2001* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-2 6-0 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2000* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Patty Schnyder | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Jan 23, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Patty Schnyder | 7-6(6) 4-6 6-2 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | #578 | #3 | 3,882 | 2,077 | 441 | 276 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 13 |
| Patty Schnyder | #278 | #7 | 3,050 | 1,987 | 492 | 346 | 58.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nadia Petrova | Patty Schnyder | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #64 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #26 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #11 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #112 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2003 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #25 | 1,751 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #12 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,734 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2005 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #9 | 1,945 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #15 | 1,848 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,990 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,818 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2007 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #14 | 1,931 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #14 | 1,793 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2008 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #7 | 1,928 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2009 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #9 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #15 | 1,828 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,879 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2011 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #29 | 1,781 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #14 | 1,827 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2012 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 13 | 2009 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2013 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,718 | 0 | 13 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #44 | 1,799 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #362 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #55 | 1,667 | 0 | 11 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #324 | 1,631 | 0 | 11 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #278 | 1,597 | 0 | 11 |