H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 2-1

Nadia Petrova holds a 2–1 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2003 Roland Garros second round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Nadia Petrova #76 6-1 6-1 Silvija Talaja #94 Match data
Mar 10, 2001* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #67 6-3 6-3 Silvija Talaja #40 Match data
Jan 10, 2000* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Silvija Talaja #23 7-6(0) 3-6 6-4 Nadia Petrova #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 130 151 46.3% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Silvija Talaja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,588 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,555 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,603 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,700 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2000 24–27 47.1% #29 1,647 0 2
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,543 0 2
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,559 0 2
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,543 0 2
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —