H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 6-1

Nadia Petrova holds a 6–1 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2010 Rome second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 2010* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Nadia Petrova #18 6-3 6-2 Tathiana Garbin #56 Match data
Sep 12, 2008* Bali WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #22 6-1 6-1 Tathiana Garbin #62 Match data
Jan 3, 2008* Gold Coast WTA 500 R32 Hard Tathiana Garbin #36 5-7 7-5 6-3 Nadia Petrova #14 Match data
Sep 18, 2004* Bali WTA 250 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #13 6-1 7-5 Tathiana Garbin #59 Match data
Jun 25, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nadia Petrova #27 6-1 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #102 Match data
May 14, 2003* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Nadia Petrova #88 6-4 6-1 Tathiana Garbin #96 Match data
Aug 1, 2001* San Diego WTA 500 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #39 5-2 (ret.) Tathiana Garbin #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,710 167 207 44.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Tathiana Garbin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,468 0 0
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2000 23–19 54.8% #42 1,629 0 1
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,577 0 1
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,557 0 1
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2004 11–18 37.9% #58 1,535 0 1
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,557 0 1
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,628 0 1
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,647 0 1
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,597 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,575 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,569 0 1