H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Vania King H2H: 4-1

Nadia Petrova holds a 4–1 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2012 Madrid second round 4-6 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 2012* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Nadia Petrova #31 4-6 6-3 6-1 Vania King #57 Match data
May 4, 2011* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Vania King #110 6-1 7-6(5) Nadia Petrova #23 Match data
Sep 24, 2010* Seoul WTA 250 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #19 6-3 6-4 Vania King #76 Match data
Apr 15, 2010* Charleston WTA 500 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #18 6-2 6-1 Vania King #75 Match data
Jun 27, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nadia Petrova #9 6-0 6-1 Vania King #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,760 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,520 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,661 0 1
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,608 0 1
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,512 0 1
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,588 0 1
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,595 0 1
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,689 0 1
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,614 0 1
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,630 0 1
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,641 0 1
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,627 0 1
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,643 0 1
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,590 0 1
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,559 0 1
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —