H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 5-1

Nadia Petrova holds a 5–1 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2007 Wimbledon third round 6-3 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Nadia Petrova #9 6-3 7-6(3) Virginia Ruano Pascual #96 Match data
Aug 31, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #6 6-1 6-1 Virginia Ruano Pascual #63 Match data
Aug 10, 2006* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Virginia Ruano Pascual #73 6-3 6-2 Nadia Petrova #5 Match data
Apr 8, 2006* Amelia Island WTA 500 QF Clay Nadia Petrova #7 6-3 6-0 Virginia Ruano Pascual #100 Match data
Jun 22, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nadia Petrova #8 4-6 6-3 6-2 Virginia Ruano Pascual #84 Match data
Aug 11, 2003 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #22 6-3 4-6 7-6(3) Virginia Ruano Pascual #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3