H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nao Hibino vs Kateryna Volodko H2H: 0-1

Kateryna Volodko holds a 1–0 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kateryna Volodko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kateryna Volodko won the 2017 Tashkent round of 16 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nao Hibino
Japan Age 31 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kateryna Volodko
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kateryna Volodko #133 6-4 7-5 Nao Hibino #68 Match data Sep 29, 2017* R16 Tashkent International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nao Hibino #228 #56 1,050 1,726 80 121 39.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Kateryna Volodko #584 #29 1,740 1,802 138 190 42.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nao Hibino Kateryna Volodko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #384 1,493 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #316 1,470 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2005 7–7 50.0% #121 1,535 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2006 5–10 33.3% #100 1,530 0 0
20 2015 6–2 75.0% #66 1,559 0 1 2007 13–19 40.6% #44 1,622 0 0
21 2016 19–22 46.3% #94 1,639 0 1 2008 15–19 44.1% #62 1,640 0 1
22 2017 11–17 39.3% #97 1,544 0 1 2009 23–20 53.5% #31 1,770 0 1
23 2018 5–10 33.3% #114 1,597 0 1 2010 8–15 34.8% #99 1,666 0 1
24 2019 6–5 54.5% #106 1,619 0 2 2011 14–10 58.3% #85 1,720 0 1
25 2020 9–6 60.0% #73 1,647 0 2 2012 7–12 36.8% #136 1,656 0 1
26 2021 5–17 22.7% #129 1,527 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2022 4–6 40.0% #138 1,578 0 2 2014 0–2 0.0% #201 1,616 0 1
28 2023 9–12 42.9% #94 1,657 0 3 2015 8–14 36.4% #89 1,605 0 1
29 2024 4–16 20.0% #145 1,603 0 3 2016 14–17 45.2% #69 1,673 0 1
30 2025 2–7 22.2% #174 1,514 0 3 2017 13–14 48.1% #92 1,652 0 2
31 2026 0–1 0.0% #228 1,558 0 3 2018 4–12 25.0% #132 1,587 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2019 0–2 0.0% #1168 1,554 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2020 5–8 38.5% #285 1,519 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #207 1,534 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2023 0–2 0.0% #276 1,553 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% #584 1,543 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nao Hibino Kateryna Volodko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2015 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 4 12 16 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2017 11 11 22 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2018 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 7 12 19 36.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2019 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 7 6 13 53.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2021 1 9 10 10.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2022 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2023 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2024 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 8 11 19 42.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2025 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 9 9 18 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 83 148 43.9% 13 27 40 32.5% 2 11 13 15.4% — — — — — 84 117 201 41.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 17 19 36 47.2% 2 1 3 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 180/195 of Nao Hibino's and 282/323 of Kateryna Volodko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nao Hibino Kateryna Volodko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 4/14 4.3 4.8 51.4% 66.4% 43.7% 52.6% 32.1% 55.4% 39.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 8/15 3.0 6.1 54.5% 61.2% 47.5% 44.5% 48.0% 54.8% 42.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 27/32 2.7 4.6 57.4% 63.9% 44.4% 57.8% 50.6% 55.6% 43.3%
21 2016 39/41 1.4 2.8 65.7% 58.2% 49.2% 50.1% 54.8% 54.9% 41.0% 2008 33/34 2.4 3.7 57.4% 64.2% 46.1% 49.9% 47.7% 56.6% 40.0%
22 2017 26/28 1.8 3.6 64.7% 58.6% 45.9% 54.7% 42.0% 53.9% 38.7% 2009 41/43 2.0 3.5 63.5% 62.3% 44.6% 49.5% 49.1% 55.7% 43.8%
23 2018 13/15 2.2 2.8 61.4% 60.0% 45.3% 59.2% 40.6% 54.4% 41.1% 2010 21/23 2.7 4.4 60.6% 59.9% 41.6% 45.5% 43.5% 52.7% 43.1%
24 2019 11/11 2.6 2.8 64.0% 64.7% 45.9% 56.5% 43.7% 57.7% 43.6% 2011 23/24 1.5 3.8 64.8% 62.4% 43.3% 53.4% 60.9% 56.0% 46.7%
25 2020 15/15 1.1 2.7 65.5% 62.6% 45.8% 52.9% 41.8% 56.6% 46.8% 2012 17/19 1.7 6.8 64.1% 61.2% 35.3% 50.6% 44.1% 51.9% 42.7%
26 2021 21/23 1.8 2.9 65.0% 55.1% 36.6% 39.9% 47.2% 48.2% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2022 10/10 1.6 2.4 70.4% 59.9% 44.7% 43.5% 51.8% 55.2% 46.5% 2014 2/2 0.5 6.0 63.1% 68.8% 28.9% 54.5% 49.2% 53.9% 42.4%
28 2023 21/21 1.4 2.2 67.4% 58.0% 47.2% 47.1% 60.3% 54.4% 42.1% 2015 14/22 1.5 5.3 69.1% 62.2% 47.4% 59.2% 56.9% 57.6% 39.7%
29 2024 20/20 1.3 3.1 65.6% 55.3% 43.7% 48.7% 50.3% 51.1% 38.4% 2016 31/31 2.5 4.5 64.8% 62.1% 43.6% 51.6% 52.0% 55.3% 44.4%
30 2025 3/9 2.0 3.0 64.6% 58.9% 48.8% 52.8% 45.8% 54.6% 43.7% 2017 26/27 2.5 5.1 62.8% 62.7% 43.7% 47.0% 57.8% 55.6% 45.0%
31 2026 1/2 2.0 3.0 63.2% 68.8% 32.1% 71.4% 25.0% 55.3% 41.6% 2018 14/16 2.1 5.7 60.0% 60.4% 41.8% 50.4% 40.5% 53.0% 39.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 2/2 2.5 7.5 48.6% 58.1% 32.0% 37.5% 34.1% 44.6% 41.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 13/13 2.1 6.0 59.6% 64.5% 40.3% 55.8% 53.2% 54.5% 41.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 2.0 3.3 58.4% 51.7% 41.3% 47.5% 33.2% 47.4% 37.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 2/2 0.0 5.0 61.7% 54.7% 35.4% 54.2% 69.0% 47.4% 38.7%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 1/1 1.0 5.0 60.3% 70.5% 65.5% 60.0% 25.0% 68.5% 31.8%
Career — 180/203 1.6 2.9 65.5% 58.6% 45.3% 50.1% 48.9% 53.8% 41.3% — 282/328 2.2 4.6 61.5% 62.4% 43.3% 51.1% 50.1% 55.0% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nao Hibino Kateryna Volodko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1493 99.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1470 92.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — 0–1 — -0.06
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1535 114.5 -0.65 -1.39 0.888 47.3% +53 -74 — 48.4% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.2 +0.22
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1530 109.9 -0.47 -1.41 0.933 48.7% +34 -81 — 39.4% -0.76 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.19
20 2015 1560 105.6 — — — — +14 — — 66.7% +0.60 1–0 — — +0.71 2007 1623 134.3 -0.20 +0.29 0.974 49.7% -9 -92 — 40.5% -0.53 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 102.9 -1.23
21 2016 1639 113.6 -1.11 -1.79 0.909 48.3% -18 -53 -78 44.0% -0.55 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 104.3 +0.05 2008 1641 129.4 +1.11 -2.53 0.922 48.7% -55 -111 +64 44.9% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.4 -0.94
22 2017 1544 109.2 -2.04 -3.51 0.840 47.2% +35 -50 — 39.0% -0.76 4–5 (44%) 1–1 — +0.77 2009 1771 139.2 +0.57 +0.61 0.989 49.9% -80 -106 -46 53.5% +0.09 8–7 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -0.90
23 2018 1597 121.9 -0.94 -1.44 0.902 47.8% +21 — — 40.0% -0.87 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.36 2010 1667 123.1 -2.00 -0.23 0.911 47.7% -7 -36 — 37.5% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.17
24 2019 1619 112.2 -0.45 -0.48 1.031 50.5% +13 — — 45.8% -0.04 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.01 2011 1721 131.2 +0.20 +2.11 1.061 51.5% -32 -47 -19 62.0% +0.92 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -1.37
25 2020 1648 124.3 +0.36 +2.53 1.079 51.6% -35 -88 — 57.6% +0.73 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.20 2012 1656 118.5 -1.96 -0.33 0.888 47.3% +28 -33 +55 36.4% -0.91 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 101.9 -1.12
26 2021 1528 96.1 -6.17 -3.62 0.754 44.2% -45 -13 -10 22.7% -2.09 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2022 1578 112.0 -0.72 +0.28 1.038 50.9% -34 — — 47.6% +0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +0.93 2014 1617 101.3 -2.50 -3.04 0.919 47.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.07
28 2023 1658 122.0 -1.96 -1.76 0.923 48.2% -9 — — 43.5% -0.33 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.9 +0.98 2015 1605 129.5 -0.14 -0.79 0.935 49.1% +30 -35 — 40.8% -0.22 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) 94.1 -1.36
29 2024 1603 118.1 -4.14 -2.60 0.784 44.9% +36 -97 -114 28.6% -1.57 3–6 (33%) 1–1 — -0.24 2016 1673 127.0 -0.24 +0.59 0.993 49.8% +20 -110 +22 44.9% -0.05 9–7 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 98.5 -1.35
30 2025 1514 109.3 -1.77 -0.47 0.962 49.4% -11 +10 — 30.0% -1.65 0–2 — — -0.04 2017 1653 121.1 -0.88 +1.50 1.012 50.3% +65 -155 — 48.3% -0.15 3–7 (30%) 2–4 (33%) 95.5 +1.05
31 2026 1558 107.8 -0.02 +0.29 0.929 48.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.10 2018 1587 117.1 -1.92 -1.90 0.835 46.5% +93 -154 +97 34.2% -0.89 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 100.9 -0.30
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1555 96.1 -2.89 -0.91 0.739 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1520 114.3 -2.12 -1.71 0.910 48.5% +80 — — 38.7% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.76
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1535 102.9 -0.85 -0.91 0.710 42.6% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 — — +0.05
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1550 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1553 107.2 -1.05 +0.97 0.736 44.2% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.28
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1543 102.6 -0.34 -0.32 1.010 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.29
Career — 1726 117.5 -2.08 -1.72 0.893 47.8% 0 -46 -68 40.3% -0.70 25–27 (48%) 18–19 (49%) 101.7 +2.42 — 1802 130.3 -0.44 -0.15 0.950 49.0% +5 -92 +35 44.0% -0.33 52–60 (46%) 33–52 (39%) 94.5 -1.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.